But we've only played 3 gamesBond would have been a killer if India had batted first. Ah well you can't win every toss. Just 3 out of 4
That's pure speculation. Singh gone now!Even had Nz batted first, Bond would still have been thrashed on all part of the ground
If Bond had gotten any swing at all he'd have been to good to hit. Gillespie would have still got slaughtered mind you.Even had Nz batted first, Bond would still have been thrashed on all part of the ground
Don't you mean "hard to hit" there?If Bond had gotten any swing at all he'd have been to good to hit. Gillespie would have still got slaughtered mind you.
He's not. Pathan then Harbhajan.Pathan is a far better batsman than Harbhajan Singh. Why is he below him in the order?
To good to hit, as in he's to good for you to hit.Don't you mean "hard to hit" there?
Cricinfo always get the orders wrong. Agarkar should be ahead of Harbhajan tooHe's not. Pathan then Harbhajan.
Oh Vettori!!!!!!
Ah...I misread it. You need another "o" in toTo good to hit, as in he's to good for you to hit.
Same as to hard to hit, not like I said he is good to hit. India are in trouble here! Surprising after such a flying start.
Give me a 'brake'Ah...I misread it. You need another "o" in to