I cannot believe that no-one saw that for what it is.Cloete said:Then the difference between 30 and 55 is 15.
Er your average only drops if you average at least 5 runs less than your career average.Cloete said:Yeah I guess.. but then there can't be reductions on your average. It's hardly worth playing club cricket because odds are your average will drop.
IMO if your average is say 30. Then the difference between 30 and 55 is 15. So your average should only drop by 1 if you average 15 or less. Otherwise there's a much better chance of reducing your average than tehre is of building it. Which I think is just stupid.
Type it up fully, email it to me and I'll look at it. I see your point.AUST_HiTMaN said:Just a small suggestion for next seasons Club Cricket. To make it fairer and give everyone an equal chance of improving based upon their own skill levels. Wouldn't it be best if you had the benchmarks set upon individual averages, rather then just saying if you average over 60, ect. Compare someone like Cloete (just using you for example mate) where his average is right up near 60 anyway, he would just have to play slightly above average to improve. Then there is a player like Samuel Vimes (again using you for example) who is around the 30 mark, who would have to play out of his skin to reach that 60 level.
I know it would be more work for the board, but IMO it would be fairer if you had it like:
2. American League (hosted in the U.S.A.)
- Unlimited number of internationals
Players may sign up to play here, but must be approved by the CWBCC if contracted.
Batting avge of 30+ current average: skill raised by 2
Batting avge lower than current: skill drops by 4 runs per 5 runs less
Bowling avge of 10- current average: skill raised by 1
Bowling avge higher than current: skill drops by 3 runs per 5 runs more
That way if Samuel Vimes had a career average of 25.00, and he played 9 games at an average of 57.00 his skill would increase by 2.
It would need refinement, but IMO its more fairer to all levels of cricketers.
Apologies if it has been suggested befoer.
Yep. Sign up.bryce said:hey Mr Mxyzptlk am i allowed to apply to play for a club or do i have to wait a bit longer to start playing ?
oh right... fair enough then mate.Mr Mxyzptlk said:Er your average only drops if you average at least 5 runs less than your career average.
AUST_HiTMaN said:Just a small suggestion for next seasons Club Cricket. To make it fairer and give everyone an equal chance of improving based upon their own skill levels. Wouldn't it be best if you had the benchmarks set upon individual averages, rather then just saying if you average over 60, ect. Compare someone like Cloete (just using you for example mate) where his average is right up near 60 anyway, he would just have to play slightly above average to improve. Then there is a player like Samuel Vimes (again using you for example) who is around the 30 mark, who would have to play out of his skin to reach that 60 level.
I know it would be more work for the board, but IMO it would be fairer if you had it like:
2. American League (hosted in the U.S.A.)
- Unlimited number of internationals
Players may sign up to play here, but must be approved by the CWBCC if contracted.
Batting avge of 30+ current average: skill raised by 2
Batting avge lower than current: skill drops by 4 runs per 5 runs less
Bowling avge of 10- current average: skill raised by 1
Bowling avge higher than current: skill drops by 3 runs per 5 runs more
That way if Samuel Vimes had a career average of 25.00, and he played 9 games at an average of 57.00 his skill would increase by 2.
It would need refinement, but IMO its more fairer to all levels of cricketers.
Apologies if it has been suggested befoer.
always on the ball dave!AUST_HiTMaN said:Yep, I'll be typing it up and sending proposal to the Board within a couple of days. It can't be too technical and time consuming, but it has to be fair.
Woohoo!Mr Mxyzptlk said:Tomorrow, if I can tie up these loose ends today. The schedule will be out today.