honestbharani
Whatever it takes!!!
lol.. the wonders of copy/paste..Oh ****, don't tell me I have to wait for report post to have a go now..
lol.. the wonders of copy/paste..Oh ****, don't tell me I have to wait for report post to have a go now..
Think you've got a few more than just that to wait...Oh ****, don't tell me I have to wait for report post to have a go now..
What does that mean?Oh ****, don't tell me I have to wait for report post to have a go now..
Keep it this way, IMO. Posters from the same country happily seem to have been lumped together, and that makes for a quick draft imo.Do we reverse order again for round 3, or randomize a new order every two rounds?
I think its better to randomize. Makes things more fair.Keep it this way, IMO. Posters from the same country happily seem to have been lumped together, and that makes for a quick draft imo.
For an even number of rounds it seems fair not to randomize. Maybe we can have a randomizer only for the 11th round.I think its better to randomize. Makes things more fair.
Round 3/5/7/9/11 will be random. Round 4/6/8/10 should be reversed!What does that mean?
Round 1:
NUFAN - Muttiah Muralitharan
weldone - Adam Gilchrist
Noble One - Glenn Mcgrath
Cevno - Curtly Ambrose
Blakus - Vivian Richards
Himmanv - Imran Khan
honestbharani - Richard Hadlee
kingkallis - Malcolm Marshall
GI Joe - Brian Lara
Shri - Kumar Sangakkara
pskov - Shane Warne
HeathDavisSpeed - Jacques Kallis
Somerset - Sachin Tendulkar
marc71178 - Wasim Akram
Marcuss - Waqar Younis
Jamee999 - Ricky Ponting
Michaelf7777777
Riggins
Round 2:
Riggins
Michaelf7777777
Jamee999
Marcuss
marc71178
Somerset
HeathDavisSpeed
pskov
Shri
GI Joe
kingkallis
honestbharani
Himmanv
Blakus
Cevno
Noble One
weldone
NUFAN
Do we reverse order again for round 3, or randomize a new order every two rounds?
Agreed.Round 3/5/7/9/11 will be random. Round 4/6/8/10 should be reversed!
Ease up chief.Round 3/5/7/9/11 will be random. Round 4/6/8/10 should be reversed!
I wouldn't say it defies logic. It gives myself and Riggins an advantage since we are going first and last, it means we have two goes in a row so we can try and set it up for ourselves and get that star on our second selection.I don't see how keeping the reverse order mechanism in place can be unfair for an even number of rounds. Defies logic, actually. I agree that for the 11th round we should have a randomizer.
Ya, this thing skipped my mind.I wouldn't say it defies logic. It gives myself and Riggins an advantage since we are going first and last, it means we have two goes in a row so we can try and set it up for ourselves and get that star on our second selection.
I guess it might not be that big an advantage, cause it's ages between goes and we have no idea if by our next go we'll be in 1902 or 2007..
Which is a fair compensation considering you must wait another 34 (rough guess) players until you can select again.I wouldn't say it defies logic. It gives myself and Riggins an advantage since we are going first and last, it means we have two goes in a row so we can try and set it up for ourselves and get that star on our second selection.
I guess it might not be that big an advantage, cause it's ages between goes and we have no idea if by our next go we'll be in 1902 or 2007..
Good Point.I wouldn't say it defies logic. It gives myself and Riggins an advantage since we are going first and last, it means we have two goes in a row so we can try and set it up for ourselves and get that star on our second selection.
I guess it might not be that big an advantage, cause it's ages between goes and we have no idea if by our next go we'll be in 1902 or 2007..