Thala_0710
International Debutant
Sachin - 74.71
And crowe, sachin played on much less batting friendly surfaces.
-
Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
Sachin 1996 vs Kohli 2016
- Thread starter Thala_0710
- Start date
And crowe, sachin played on much less batting friendly surfaces.
capt_Luffy
International Coach
I will not agree to that. Think Rohit is in the tier with Iyer, infact I am not sure who was better between them, one below Virat and above Rahul.
Thala_0710
International Debutant
Just an illustration how much faster and better for batting the last 3 WCs have been compared to the rest.
subshakerz
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
No I'm saying I'm not sure Tendulkar wins in a landslide poll.
capt_Luffy
International Coach
It's ofcourse been way faster but the avg difference between it and 96 has been like 2 runs.
Thala_0710
International Debutant
Can make 1 and find out.
Thala_0710
International Debutant
Yes, but it's because everyone is playing faster. If batsmen played at a similar SR as before, the avg difference would be way higher just because of ease of batting now.
So 1996 wc was also very batting friendly?
The average is quite close to last 3 WC
Thala_0710
International Debutant
Look at the SR too. People earlier played slower and just played long. If the guys decided to do that today, the avgs would soar but it wouldn't be good for the team as they would be doing it at a slower rate.
I think the value of SR is getting underrated here quite a lot. It's just as important as avg is in ODI cricket. The avgs appear similar today because everyone is taking more risk and playing faster. Not because of ease of batting conditions.
capt_Luffy
International Coach
Agree. But think that's also to do with what was considered "aggressive" by time period.
Thala_0710
International Debutant
Yeah that's true.
It also illustrates though that Sachin 96 beats Kohli 23 on absolute RPI and is much faster relatively too. Hence, a clear no 1, and kohli 23 is one which I wouldn't put in my top 3.
But again, I think we have a different view on ODIs in general, which results in the differing opinions on the Kohli campaign, which is fine too.
Thala_0710
International Debutant
On a side note, Tendulkar in the group stage game against SL in 1996, plays a brilliant knock of 137(137), while his opening partner, Manoj Prabhakar, makes 7(36). 7(36) for ****s sake. Wth was that.
capt_Luffy
International Coach
Was vying for Sunny's 36*
Thala_0710
International Debutant
Even that had a higher SR.
Coronis
Hall of Fame Member
He was facing the tough bowlers so Tendulkar could beat up the **** ones.
subshakerz
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Reminds me when Jayasurias opening partner got removed for a duck after an opening stand of 71.
honestbharani
Whatever it takes!!!
I think Virat carried a better side in worst form, if that makes sense.
But on absolute quality, I think Sachin's is greater. He even ensured his failures were against the worse sides in the competition, lol.
But on absolute quality, I think Sachin's is greater. He even ensured his failures were against the worse sides in the competition, lol.