Yes and soon to be gracing the pitches of the San Siro (Luca Toni might be there if Fiorentina do or do not go down) and his goal and Del Piero's were good. It was a good game as well, very enjoyable. Those who keep on harping on about how boring Italy (namely some English fans on here)are obviously do not appreciate good football and I hope they win it now.TT Boy said:What a game, what a finale. As Virgil observed ‘Fortune favours the brave’ and the Italians were worthy winners because of their commitment to attack and not allow such a great game of football be ‘spoiled’ by dreaded penalties.
Fabio Grosso’s celebration was Tardelli like and his performances throughout the tournament have been admirable. When you consider he only ‘became’ a left back very late in his career and spent most of his younger days knocking around in Serie C2 and B, sublime finish also.
Also may add thought the ref was fantastic tonight, in a tournament where good officiating has not been paramount, was nice to see a game of football allowed to flow so fluently.
Forza Italia!
Shouldn't De Rossi's ban be over now since they made the final?TT Boy said:? Marco Materazzi, Daniele De Rossi, Simone Barone, Gennaro Gattuso are pretty hard and dirty customers. Doubt you find (other than Australia of course) a more ’willing’ team to get rough with.
Hence the phrase "a shot at the last four". And yes, regardless of what you think of the penalty and its validity, Australia were obviously in a good position to win the match prior to Grosso's "gamesmanship" six seconds from time. Not sure how much more you could be "robbed".TT Boy said:Neither are Italy, also whose to say you would have beaten Ukraine.
It's actually just as bad. England won one in Euro 96 and Italy won one in Euro 2000, and both have lost all the other shootouts they have been involved in. Only Holland are worse, who I think have lost every shootout they've ever been involved in.Tom Halsey said:Italy have almost as bad a record as England when it comes to penalties, so they'd better hope it doesn't go that far.
And I doubt no other Australian player wouldn't have done the same thing. If Bresciano or Cahill did it, got the penalty and Craig Moore had converted it they would be national hero's and the Italians whinging and getting labled as sore losers.FaaipDeOiad said:Hence the phrase "a shot at the last four". And yes, regardless of what you think of the penalty and its validity, Australia were obviously in a good position to win the match prior to Grosso's "gamesmanship" six seconds from time. Not sure how much more you could be "robbed".
Regardless, Italy played far better last night than they have in the tournament so far, and deserved the win.
Yeah, though I doubt he will start considering how well Perrotta has played in his absence and the fact that Lippi was extremely ****ed off with De Rossi.Craig said:Shouldn't De Rossi's ban be over now since they made the final?
They might have done it, where did I suggest they wouldn't? Doesn't alter the fact that if they did Italian fans wouldn't be too happy about it, and if the circumstances with regard to the 10 man side, 60% of the possession in the second half and so on were in Italy's favour and they lost 1-0 to a dodgy penatly a few seconds from the end, they'd have been pretty well robbed as well.Craig said:And I doubt no other Australian player wouldn't have done the same thing. If Bresciano or Cahill did it, got the penalty and Craig Moore had converted it they would be national hero's and the Italians whinging and getting labled as sore losers.
Anyway Australia shouldn't have let Italy back into the match.
People said the same about England beating Portugal and look what happened.GeraintIsMyHero said:They won't
France for the World Cup
Totally agreeCraig said:Before I thought France were living off past glory, but to their credit they are not at the moment.
actually, the dutch have only ever been involved in one WC shoot-out, against Brazil in the '98 semi. They lost, of course.GeraintIsMyHero said:It's actually just as bad. England won one in Euro 96 and Italy won one in Euro 2000, and both have lost all the other shootouts they have been involved in. Only Holland are worse, who I think have lost every shootout they've ever been involved in .
France for the World Cup
The penalty was nearly as dodgy as the sending off... you're bound to get more possession against 10 men - it's what you do with it and Australia did nothing with it. An Italian defender also wouldn't have been naive enough to just throw himself to the floor in front of a forward and have a little grab at his leg.FaaipDeOiad said:They might have done it, where did I suggest they wouldn't? Doesn't alter the fact that if they did Italian fans wouldn't be too happy about it, and if the circumstances with regard to the 10 man side, 60% of the possession in the second half and so on were in Italy's favour and they lost 1-0 to a dodgy penatly a few seconds from the end, they'd have been pretty well robbed as well.
If he's going to keep whinging about it someone is going to keep setting him straight.dontcloseyoureyes said:Don't worry Scaly, marc did all of that for you when it happened. No need to go over well trodden ground.
Except you will note that when informed of this, he decided that I was whinging and wrong.GeraintIsMyHero said:Marc and Scaly in agreement - my word