So why did he lift his arm and shoulder towards Grosso then?Cloete said:The key was that Neill for mine did not make any attempt to attack the player or the ball
well they are gradually improving every game, socring goals at will & passing delighfully, only problem they have is in defense where as you rightfully teams with better finishing ability should give them a serious run for their money which should be good news for England presuming we meet them in the semi's..GeraintIsMyHero said:LOL I would disagree
Yeah me too, but ehhhhh, I dunno. I'll set my alarm for 5 and get up then. I don't work until 5pm anywayJono said:I'm tired but I want to stay up for Spain vs. France
He definitely made a meal of it, but that is actually irrelevant to the decision.Jono said:What I mean though is do you think Neill's contact caused him to fall to the ground, or did he take advantage of that and hence take a dive?
Come back for the original infringement, obviously, unless it was commited against the team who susequently scored, in which case the advantage should be played.marc71178 said:And that is the exact reason it can't be brought in.
What if the next break is the other team putting the ball in the net?
Nope. Brazil, Spain or Johnny Frenchy for us if we're to jam our way past Filipao's boys...JASON said:England need to beat Argentina (their likely opponent in the Semi ) .
I hope for England's sake that Germany v Argentina is fiery affair and at least 2 Argentinians (preferably Maxi Rodriguesz and Rechelme or Lionel Messi or even Tevez ) get Red carded . (Not sure if yellow cards get wiped out by the Semi's )
Most unnecessary tackle ever? A centre-half going away from goal. Schoolboy stuff.TT Boy said:Good decision by the ref, **** knows what Lilian Thuram was thinking.
For sure, Pablo as you say was only going backwards. Thuram let his team down badly, France had made a pretty bright start to the game.BoyBrumby said:Most unnecessary tackle ever? A centre-half going away from goal. Schoolboy stuff.