Perhaps you have answered your own question. Just throwing it out there.And the silliest thing about that was it was a completely unneccessary waste - the game was pretty much lost by then, but runs were there to be had if batsmen went for them. There was absolutely no need whatsoever to score quickly.
Just seemed to demonstrate a lack of hunger for runs, which for someone who has scored so heavily the last 8 seasons seems inexplicable.
Personally, I do not see this combination succeeding in test cricket. Two openers with defensive mindsights have rarely succeeded in test match cricket since Ive started watching and I dont see that changing anytime soon. Then when you consider the technical flaws that both batsmen possess in abundance, it only makes things worse.Strauss and Cook have got in first. It really is as simple as that.
2 years isnt that much. At 29 Key is hardly a young buck on the charge. Id also back Strauss to score more runs.I rate Key quite likely, and I dont think he should have been dropped when he was in 2004. I like his technique and his performance at OT against the touring WI will always stand out in my mind because of the quality of bowling that he faced from Corey Collymore in the 2nd innings. Still believe that hes more likely to succeed at the test match level than Strauss and hes much younger too.
Personally I don't mind two defensive openers. I'd much prefer both play defensively than try and play shots - especially Strauss, as that's exactly what got him into trouble in 2006 and 2007.Personally, I do not see this combination succeeding in test cricket. Two openers with defensive mindsights have rarely succeeded in test match cricket since Ive started watching and I dont see that changing anytime soon. Then when you consider the technical flaws that both batsmen possess in abundance, it only makes things worse.