I dont care in what fashion you accuse people of, the fact is that you do. And you dont need me to accuse of biased, you yourself have accepted the bias in your response to 'aussie'.
*waits for new spin from KaZoH0lic*
Oh lord, was that it? One is not even directed at you and was a general plea for people to put away their tinted glasses - not just Indians, all the people in the forum.
The other was a question after having dismissed every bit of your non-sense and was a serious question. Is Tendulkar that important for you that you are willing to argue, for example, that his record against S.Africa is good?
And you should care what fashion it is used in...because that was my whole point. If you ask me if I have bias, it's a plain question I can ask easily and move on from. Do I have bias when talking about guys like Warne and Lillee, yes I do. But do I try to imply other peoples' bias simply because the contention is not one I agree with? I was called biased without even having gone half-through the reasoning why I consider Ponting better. That's the difference and that matters.
Unlike You, I dont come here and discuss things with a nationalistic bias.
This kind of drivel is littered through the thread. By you, by others...hence that plea. I mean, how many times did you accuse me of saying something I didn't even say? Ponting better than Richards?
It's just sad.
LOL, I didn't even accuse you of nationalistic bias, I just cared if you were biased in general.
As aforesaid, I didn't use it the same fashion as you. Nor the same frequency. I didn't need to. Every little argument you brought forward I replied to in a detailed fashion - with facts, figures and logic.
