No, I'd rather him win us games of cricket for a longer time, even if it means that his stats aren't as good as they could be.Would you not like to see him retire at the top of his game rather than go on and have people remember what would otherwise have been seen as a magnificent career end-up being just an excellent one?
Rest easy mate.
As a batsman, Punter is half-man, half-machine.
Machines don't need practice.
Just flick the on switch.
You mean like what people are going to do with Tendulkar?Would you not like to see him retire at the top of his game rather than go on and have people remember what would otherwise have been seen as a magnificent career end-up being just an excellent one?
Best post ever.No, I'd rather him win us games of cricket for a longer time, even if it means that his stats aren't as good as they could be.
AWTA.No, I'd rather him win us games of cricket for a longer time, even if it means that his stats aren't as good as they could be.
What does that mean, mate?AWTA.
Agree with the above. A few little shortenings like that have taken off in the "Off Topic" section, and thus have started spreading over to Cricket Chat.What does that mean, mate?
Surely if his stats become average, he's winning less games of cricket than he was (or someone else who might replace him might well be)?No, I'd rather him win us games of cricket for a longer time, even if it means that his stats aren't as good as they could be.
Agree - plus this is all a big hypothetical assuming he'll drop off because he's taken a break. I think he'll actually continue to comfortably be the best batsman in both forms for the next 2 years.Lets say he averages 42 over the next six years (completely arbitrary [sp] numbers), and it drags his average down to less stupendous levels. If he's making those runs in important situations, at critical times that help us win games of cricket (much like what S. Waugh was doing in his final years) as well as the added extras of his fielding and captaincy (and in recent times, it has seemed as though he has been getting better in this aspect) then there's no reason why he shouldn't continue.
And additionally, there isn't the next generation of players battering down the door at the moment as there has been for the past 15 years.
42 is hardly a bad average.Lets say he averages 42 over the next six years (completely arbitrary [sp] numbers), and it drags his average down to less stupendous levels. If he's making those runs in important situations, at critical times that help us win games of cricket (much like what S. Waugh was doing in his final years) as well as the added extras of his fielding and captaincy (and in recent times, it has seemed as though he has been getting better in this aspect) then there's no reason why he shouldn't continue.
And additionally, there isn't the next generation of players battering down the door at the moment as there has been for the past 15 years.