• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Replacement Runners

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
The thing about the bowling analogy is that you still have the same number of fielders and the same amount of opportunities to bowl at the opposition whereas if a batsman can't have a runner then that team is penalised and only has to lose 9 wickets to be bowled out.

And the "they should just hit fours" theory is a tad harsh as it would also mean that the other bloke could also only score boundaries. Seems somewhat draconian and against the spirit of the game far more than someone batting with a runner.
 

Top