TheJediBrah
Request Your Custom Title Now!
I can't find anything sensible in this entire post tbhI think Tendulkar is the anti-Bradman.
Bradman is beyond comparison, and Tendulkar is always compared with everyone who has played a semi-decent straight drive in his life.
The other day, I was thinking who are the different cricketers compared to Tendulkar over the last 30 years - Sanjay Manjrekar, Mark Waugh, Sourav Ganguly, Sanath Jayasuriya, Aravinda De Silva, Vinod Kambli, Brian Lara, Inzamam-ul Haq, Basit Ali, Graeme Hick, Ricky Ponting, Jacques Kallis, Rahul Dravid, Virender Sehwag, Kumar Sangakkara, Mahela Jayawardena, Matthew Hayden, Adam Gilchrist, AB De Villiers, Kane Williamson, Virat Kohli, Rohit Sharma and the list goes on
The funny thing is that all the above people are compared with Tendulkar; but they are almost never compared among themselves. I mean no one really asks how Aravinda De Silva compares with Matthew Hayden do they?
You think no one compares two batsmen unless one is Tendulkar? And it seems from this post that you are implying Tendulkar is definitively better than all those other players in the same way Bradman is, which is incredibly bizarre.
If you had a point I'll admit that I've missed it as well.