Well, the first one's quite easy to find - Charles Bannerman scored 165 against England in the first ever test match.Kinda an interesting record. Steve Waugh held it in 1999 when he tonned up against Zimbabwe and India before Bangas got test status, at this stage Kirsten was missing Zimbabwe
But a few years later he got his ton against Zim and Bangas before Waugh did coz he played against Bangas before Waugh did
now neither hold the record as Afghanistan and Ireland are around
Wonder who are all the holders of this record through history?
That innings against SL is my favourite innings of his.I know this isn't quite the topic. Felt I needed to add this for SA's batting. I don't think Cullinan is too far off G.Kirsten in recognition and importance to that batting line-up.
I seem to remember glorious innings against India and Murali's Sri Lanka. Remember him standing alone v Devon Malcolm and it was all done with stroke-play.
In his last 3 years of test cricket he averaged just short of 60 which is also interesting considering most players drop-off. He got better.
Did what? (If it's "scored a Test hundred against all other Test countries", I think only Hammond of the above did it; none of the others played against New Zealand. Hobbs had done so at one point - he became the first with hundreds against 3 other countries when he scored 159 against the West Indies in 1928).South African batsmen from that era are ruled out by default, as are West Indian batters consequently. Bradman and Hammond each did do it. McCabe too. Hobbs also.
Oh crap New Zealand. Forgot about them but can you blame me?Did what? (If it's "scored a Test hundred against all other Test countries", I think only Hammond of the above did it; none of the others played against New Zealand. Hobbs had done so at one point - he became the first with hundreds against 3 other countries when he scored 159 against the West Indies in 1928).