So pretty much before every noun and every verb or generally just to make conversation?C_C said:'kaffir' is used just about as liberally in Arabic as 'f*ck' in English or 'chootiya' in Hindi/Urdu.
danish said:So pretty much before every noun and every verb or generally just to make conversation?
I fail to see how acknowledging these racial elements has any bearing on my ability to tarnish the rest of the country, there are far greater things that Australia has yet to repent for that paints a far sadder picture (being fully aware, as I am sure you and others are, of the effect the stolen generation has had on Australia), so fear not my brush.TopCat said:So your reaction to an acknowledged minority of racists is to tarnish the rest of the country with the same brush by not barracking for Australia? Your argument is muddled; do you actually believe it's a minority or do you believe an entire country is racist so the team representing the whole country (not just the racist minority) doesn't deserve your support?
An entire bay of supporters shouting “Show us your passports” to the main contingent of Sri Lankan supporters is a racial taunt in my eyes. It’s a real pity that most people you know, or most of the people on the boards weren’t there then, because we sure told them to stop it.Top Cat said:And that's pretty much exactly what I do. So do most people I know. So would you, so would most people on this board.Galactic_Soap said:This is a plea to the non racial cricket loving Australian, of which they are many, I am aware this is a minority. Stand and be counted next time you hear, see or are aware of this dispicable behaviour, don't let the world judge you, because in life, as in cricket, people intepret perception as reality.
When Sri Lanka played in Sydney 2002/2003 three idiots, squirted tomato sauce onto a Sri Lankan player who was not playing that game, there was nearly an all in brawl, but the Sri Lankan section of the crowd acted in a mature way, the three were ******ed away by the security, the entire bay cheered, Aussie and Sri Lankan alike. I have numerous witnesses (Australian and Sri Lankan alike) who will attest to those three returning to their seats 20 minutes later. That confused the hell out of me.Top Cat said:For the record, I'm an Aboriginal/Scot whose Dad is an unfortunate member of the Stolen Generation so I think we get the gist of racism is about. The reality is that it's everywhere. Generally in the minority but in every group there is always that minority.
As for what CA is supposed to do about the current crop, do what they've always done; punish those they catch. Catching them is the tough bit. I work for the Police too so I understand how tough it is to stop any phenomena where human nature is the cuprit.
That’s a pretty simplistic view of an extremely important issue. All discussion in this thread has been vigorous and mature, just how it should be, that in itself is productive.Linda said:I fail to see the point of this... this is heading no where productive
Great idea. That would be a start and a step in the right direction.Jono said:Are the current punishments tough enough? Eviction is obviously strict, but considering running on the field will cost you an arm or a leg, should continous racist remarks (not something like "I wish Gilly would hit a six here to shut this black c-word behind me up" (not that that talk is right or whatever)) should result in a frickin' heavy fine to shut them up.
Fair point, “kaffir boetties” is not something your average Australian would know, and use.kwigibo said:From the article on Cricinfo:
"The worst incidents occurred during the Test at Perth in December when several players were called "kaffirs" and "kaffir boetties""
This definitely suggests to me that the guilty parties in question are of South African ancestry in one way or another. Even though some of us are well aware of such epithets, this is not the language that would be used by racists here without some South African history. Although this does raise another disturbing issue, one that some of us are unfortunately aware of, and that is that many prejudiced South Africans have seen fit to emigrate here (I know more than a few SA ex-pats, but I don't know of more than a minority {there's that word again, let's hope it's true} who are prejudiced), which would suggest that our society is more conducive to their feelings about racial issues, which is very disheartening to me.
I agree and I am not accusing an entire country of this, again, just this incredibly vocal section of the minority.Top Cat said:Racism is a terrible phenomena to suffer but equally, it's a horrific charge to be tarnished with if you're innocent
Sensationalism is rife in the Australian media. In this instance though, they have aired all the aspects of your argument in all the reports I have heard. With the main reocurring theme being: "South African expats hurl racial slurs" I just want people to be held accountable, South African expat, Australian or Sri Lankan.Top Cat said:All I've seen is exaggerated news stories, random anecdotal quotes from tangentially-related people to the teams/games and vast generalisations.
Well put, and I certainly can’t argue with that logic.Top Cat said:This is an equal but opposite sort of rhetoric which fuels the racism in the first place because, again, the emphasis isn't on evidence but on emotive statements and instead of information 'intelligence' we have dodgy conclusions and subsequent ignorance. On both sides.
I think you are a bit ignorant of the subject in light. While the word kaffir means unbeliever in Arabic, it is also a word in South Africa and totally seperate from the Arab region.C_C said:Strictly speaking, 'kaffir' is an arabic term, which means 'unbeliever'. I understand that OZ has seen a huge rise in middle-eastern immigrants. As such, it is likely that some of the oft used arabic words are slowly becomming part of the general vocabulary with the intended connotation not changing by much.
and 'kaffir' is used just about as liberally in Arabic as 'f*ck' in English or 'chootiya' in Hindi/Urdu.
Totally dead wrong. No such phenomenon in the US. The hispanics are 12 percent of the US populace, and no significant spanish words have been incorporated in American English so far...what makes you think we will believe what you are ridiculously impling. Infact I don't even know what it means.C_C said:It is much the same with the word 'chootiya' in Canada or Britain. More people of the general populace ( be it home grown white boys or 2nd generation east asians or even the native americans) know the meaning of that term than i've ever seen before....
yes, i am aware of the usage of the term 'Kaffir' in South Africa. However, you will find that the origin of the word is Arabic. The term 'kaffir', meaning 'unbeliever' had been applied to south african/zimbabwe natives much before the european settlers arrived- after tangyanika and zanzibar converted to Islam, they started referring to these southern areas as Kaffirs, as they had extensive trade with them, particularly in gold and incense.I think you are a bit ignorant of the subject in light. While the word kaffir means unbeliever in Arabic, it is also a word in South Africa and totally seperate from the Arab region.
Kaffir was originally a member of a group of Bantu-speaking people of SE Africa; it has come to be used as a contemptuous term for any person of color now.
The word kaffir (also keffir or kaffer) is a derogatory term used in South Africa for native Africans. (It was also used historically to refer to the inhabitants of South Africa during the period of colonisation, but this usage is slowly fading away. This second usage is not considered vulgar.)
Next time, step into a jewellery shop in the US and see how many lockets/bracelets are being engraved with the phrase 'Te amo/ Mi amore' (sp?)Totally dead wrong. No such phenomenon in the US. The hispanics are 12 percent of the US populace, and no significant spanish words have been incorporated in American English so far...what makes you think we will believe what you are ridiculously impling. Infact I don't even know what it means.
If everyone made their points as eloquently and with such good manners and maturity as you have done, there would be no need whatsoever to close any threads.Galactic_Soap said:.
Why must we close this thread? I urge admin not to, instead lets commit right here right now to reporting such incidents and pushing the issue untill there is an outcome.
Regards,
Soapy
My father's profession being an African Historian, leads me to my claims. The words, though amazingly similar in pronounciation have no relationship to each other. The tribe that called itself that still exists today, and predates Islam by 700 years.C_C said:yes, i am aware of the usage of the term 'Kaffir' in South Africa. However, you will find that the origin of the word is Arabic. The term 'kaffir', meaning 'unbeliever' had been applied to south african/zimbabwe natives much before the european settlers arrived- after tangyanika and zanzibar converted to Islam, they started referring to these southern areas as Kaffirs, as they had extensive trade with them, particularly in gold and incense.
Besides the abundance of hispanic labor everywhere here in the states, the language is strictly a simple second language. It has no incursions in American English.C_C said:Next time, step into a jewellery shop in the US and see how many lockets/bracelets are being engraved with the phrase 'Te amo/ Mi amore' (sp?)
That is something that is your opinion. And you are admitting to it. I can't argue that its wrong, just that it probably isn't the best median to convince or inform someone.C_C said:And i am not talking about the US in this case- i've heard several english folks with zero subcontinental links use the word chootiya, particularly the ones who live around Manchester/Bradford area. I live in Vancouver, where the subcontinental base is fairly large(we have some street signs in Gurumukhi) and i've heard the word 'chootiya' being used by even 2nd gen. Korean dudes. You will find that that is how new terms often incorporate themselves into a language, particularly in a hodge-podge language such as english.
I doubt that very strongly. I'm no linguist, but I can think of dozens of English words that sound like they came to us from Spanish: rodeo, pronto, taco, enchilada, aficionado, armada, bronco, embargo, guacamole, desperado, nacho, peccadillo....jack_sparrow said:Besides the abundance of hispanic labor everywhere here in the states, the language is strictly a simple second language. It has no incursions in American English.
In that case, i withdraw my claim regarding 'kaffir'.My father's profession being an African Historian, leads me to my claims. The words, though amazingly similar in pronounciation have no relationship to each other. The tribe that called itself that still exists today, and predates Islam by 700 years.
Good ol BoyBrumbie has given quite a few examples. I will leave it at that.Besides the abundance of hispanic labor everywhere here in the states, the language is strictly a simple second language. It has no incursions in American English.
Exactlyhowardj said:I dont really see the point in this thread. I think most people on here strongly condemn racism; the comments are made by an unfortunate minority; it's not something unique to cricket or to Australia; and, finally, if the Authorities can identify the people responsible, they should be booted out.
C_C said:In that case, i withdraw my claim regarding 'kaffir'.
Good ol BoyBrumbie has given quite a few examples. I will leave it at that.
Jono said:Are the current punishments tough enough? Eviction is obviously strict, but considering running on the field will cost you an arm or a leg, should continous racist remarks (not something like "I wish Gilly would hit a six here to shut this black c-word behind me up" (not that that talk is right or whatever)) should result in a frickin' heavy fine to shut them up.
Looks like Cricket Australia read my mind. This will be a positive move IMO, and should deter a large proportion of idiots from making their racial views public at a cricket match.Sutherland said CA was contemplating introducing heavy fines – at a similar level to existing $6000 fines for running onto the ground – for racist fans and banning them from cricket venues.
Hear fricken' hear. For both of you.If everyone made their points as eloquently and with such good manners and maturity as you have done, there would be no need whatsoever to close any threads.
Nah, I gotcha now. In Australia, sport = life so I made the fundamental attribution error of assuming you were referring to Australia at large initially (a side-effect of some other posters on the board; hard to avoid, sometimes). All good, other than eating steak but then I'm a vegetarian so feel free to ignore me.There is no reason as to why I should not have, and proclaim my own personal bias when it comes to cricket. I support a team because I have a strong emotional and patriotic bond with that nation. I have grown up watching South Africa burst into international cricket, and rugby. I have possibly learnt one of my biggest life lessons and watch close to 40 million South Africans learn one with me when Nelson Mandela handed the trophy to Francois Pienaar. I’ve seen how a game of sport can prove to be a powerful tool for good.
I hope I have expressed my self clearer here; lack of allegiance in a particular sport does not have any bearing on my feelings towards this country. I am happy, grateful and love living in Sydney. I am an Eels supporter to the bone. I adore my beer, and can cook and eat a pretty good steak. Don’t interpret my words as malice. I have already acknowledged the racial elements as a minority.
Yet another example of the yobbo mentality for sure. Certainly, throwing them out was a good idea. Shame it wasn't put into action.When Sri Lanka played in Sydney 2002/2003 three idiots, squirted tomato sauce onto a Sri Lankan player who was not playing that game, there was nearly an all in brawl, but the Sri Lankan section of the crowd acted in a mature way, the three were ******ed away by the security, the entire bay cheered, Aussie and Sri Lankan alike. I have numerous witnesses (Australian and Sri Lankan alike) who will attest to those three returning to their seats 20 minutes later. That confused the hell out of me.
Indeed. It's a minority (racists) of a minority (SA ex-pats) causing some of the problem. The problem there is that SA ex-pats get tarnished because of the behaviour of the few too.Sensationalism is rife in the Australian media. In this instance though, they have aired all the aspects of your argument in all the reports I have heard. With the main reocurring theme being: "South African expats hurl racial slurs" I just want people to be held accountable, South African expat, Australian or Sri Lankan.
I've watched a few Australia vs. NZ games in Aus', and I personally have had to endlessly endure these really weak and sad old sheep-shagger jokes (especially at the 'Gabba). It's quite absurd considering what a minor element bovine farming is in the entire context of NZ, but they keep trotting out the same tired old banter, and weren't to happy when we dished some out back.Almost every other NZlander I've talked too who has watched trans-tasmen events in Australia has told me of a similar experience. I think the large capacity of Australian ground and that lovable 'yobbo' element in Australian society makes it a bit inevitable. I think the racial taunts probably have more to do with a small element of the Aussie crown needing SOMETHING insultingto say, and the resulting racial taunts the result of general ignorance about the subcontinent countries. If Aussies knew more about the country's in question, they'd make fun of their fans with somethng more specific about those countries than the colour of their skin.Galactic_Soap said:I went to the India versus Australia new years test, same thing, racism. Sri Lanka versus Australia where Jayasuria and Attapatu pilled on the runs in Sydney, racism. In fact the only game I’ve seen where I haven’t seen, heard, or been subjected to racism in Australia is, wait for it, South Africa versus New Zealand at the SCG.
I just got back from Kiwi land.. So many racists over there.. Everyone was bagging me for saying SIIIIX, instead of ***.. Or should I say SUCKS..Truekiwijoker said:I've watched a few Australia vs. NZ games in Aus', and I personally have had to endlessly endure these really weak and sad old sheep-shagger jokes (especially at the 'Gabba). It's quite absurd considering what a minor element bovine farming is in the entire context of NZ, but they keep trotting out the same tired old banter, and weren't to happy when we dished some out back.Almost every other NZlander I've talked too who has watched trans-tasmen events in Australia has told me of a similar experience. I think the large capacity of Australian ground and that lovable 'yobbo' element in Australian society makes it a bit inevitable. I think the racial taunts probably have more to do with a small element of the Aussie crown needing SOMETHING insultingto say, and the resulting racial taunts the result of general ignorance about the subcontinent countries. If Aussies knew more about the country's in question, they'd make fun of their fans with somethng more specific about those countries than the colour of their skin.
Of course I could be wrong...