Athlai
Not Terrible
Reckon this one comes true this year, he's already got himself a min contract, but a big showing in the next Test see him maybe get $100k.I bet his dad can already see the IPL $$$$.
Reckon this one comes true this year, he's already got himself a min contract, but a big showing in the next Test see him maybe get $100k.I bet his dad can already see the IPL $$$$.
Haha fair. But you gotta post the denominator, not just the numerator.W R O N G
R
O
N
G
W R O N G
R
O
N
G
I'm in the same boat as silentstriker... easier to predict winning a lotto as compared to a kid making to international cricket. Particularly not when they are like 5 or 7Dunno - it depends. I don't know how much pressure the kid has in his daily life. The father could have just posted the videos like people post spelling bees and such - it doesn't necessarily have to translate to any pressure. It all depends on the father obviously.
And yes, predicting any professional cricket, let alone international cricket is beyond crazy at such an age.
I hate to turn our respective jokes into a serious conversation, but you've forced my hand because the premise of yours directly contradicts the premise of mine. Cricket really isn't very popular in NZ (some posters to disagree, no doubt). A traditional/well covered by mainstream media sport with low participation/engagement in reality, imo.Yeah but then I heard there isn't a lot else to do in new Zealand other than play cricket in the summer and rugby in winter?
It's similar elsewhere but less extreme than Auckland. Social cricket tends to be supported by workplaces putting a team together. Club cricket can even have entire sides of migrants, and then other clubs who might just have 1-2. I'm not sure what to read into that.Feel like in Auckland cricket (particularly at the more social end of the scale) is basically 90% kept afloat by recent Indian migrants who are completely unrepresented at FC or international level. But that's just my heavily urbanised, ignorant of agribusiness, city slicker observation.
The under-representation of the Asian community and almost complete absence of the Polynesian community in professional domestic cricket does make me wonder whether NZ is a few years away from a similar sort of scandal to what's hit England in the past month. Hope not, but I wouldn't be surprised.Feel like in Auckland cricket (particularly at the more social end of the scale) is basically 90% kept afloat by recent Indian migrants who are completely unrepresented at FC or international level. But that's just my heavily urbanised, ignorant of agribusiness, city slicker observation.
Oh yeah absolutely, cricket inherently is a bit of a hard sell for "the masses". I imagine it's a bit like England where I understand that despite the rich history of cricket there, across the whole populace it's really not that big. I also figure that Australia is rather less "cricket mad" than we might imagine it is, although I think it's a bit more of a cultural staple there than it is in NZ.Cricket being less popular than the various football codes is pretty common accross the world, though.
For NZ, rather like rowing, it is popular enough in the 'right' places to funnel enough talented youth to the programs. Is my take. By places I mean the traditional schools.
I've referenced this many times before, but when I used to play 2-day grades in Lower Hutt, some of the behaviour was absolutely shocking.I'd also say the attitudes in the lower grade two day comps can be pretty toxic, I don't really want to spend a day being subject to increasingly aggressive and personal sledging by the Mayor of Hutt City at the Wainuiomata recreation ground, thanks.
It's extremely common to play against teams entirely consisting of first generation Indian immigrants, and I think in large part that's because they choose to form a team together - but then I think that was a feature in the Yorkshire thing too, so not exactly a defence against accusations of racism? I also think it might be a bit different in that rather than being "locals" of subcontinental heritage, a huge number of the cricketers in Auckland are actually very recent (last 5 years or so) and/or temporary migrants.The under-representation of the Asian community and almost complete absence of the Polynesian community in professional domestic cricket does make me wonder whether NZ is a few years away from a similar sort of scandal to what's hit England in the past month. Hope not, but I wouldn't be surprised.
Cricket's very culturally ingrained in Australia. Lots of people claim to hate it but people kind of know what's going in on the home Tests to an extent even if they don't like watching it, especially if it's against India or England. Football codes are bigger but cricket dominates the summer psyche.Oh yeah absolutely, cricket inherently is a bit of a hard sell for "the masses". I imagine it's a bit like England where I understand that despite the rich history of cricket there, across the whole populace it's really not that big. I also figure that Australia is rather less "cricket mad" than we might imagine it is, although I think it's a bit more of a cultural staple there than it is in NZ.
Really I'm just countering a possible misconception that cricket must be huge in NZ given our heroic performances, and humblebragging by doing so.