• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Question on ban announcements

Daemon

Request Your Custom Title Now!
It’s a fairly lame infraction tbf
Can't beat the time where I replied to a post about hb and weldone, praised weldone (like legit no sarcasm) and then got an infraction because I didn't praise hb. They claimed it was trolling by omission :laugh:
 

harsh.ag

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Can't beat the time where I replied to a post about hb and weldone, praised weldone (like legit no sarcasm) and then got an infraction because I didn't praise hb. They claimed it was trolling by omission :laugh:
Heh. I remember this.
 

dontcloseyoureyes

BARNES OUT
Can't beat the time where I replied to a post about hb and weldone, praised weldone (like legit no sarcasm) and then got an infraction because I didn't praise hb. They claimed it was trolling by omission :laugh:
That might be the dumbest thing I've read in a while and I've got a group chat with sledger in it.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
Haha that infraction is a shocker

Which mod gave it?
Jack haha.

I can't remember if we had a discussion about it first or not but as horrible as it seems in hindsight (and it was definitely wrong), it didn't seem quite as stupid at the time. I can definitely see how Jack could've seen the post as a deliberate way to have a crack at hb, even though it wasn't.
 

Top