Blewy
Cricketer Of The Year
Ok Ill try and explain it better..I can this see meant to be leveller for mid range lower sides to catch up. But would it be possible to have fixed levels, reckon the suggested format is bit to airer fairly from how read. I might be mis read it. Say your predicted to finish in position x, finish higher or lower then you get fixed percentaged of potential sponsorship. Say 10% for example for each position in each format.
Each team will be given 3 different sponsorship options, all will range in expectations and will have different options in them. For higher teams these goals will be much higher then those of lowers sides but with the 3 options you will be able to select what you feel as though you could achieve best. So for example your team, you may get 3 options as follows:
Option A:
Finish top in FC - $1,000,000
Runner Up (or better) in OD - $750,000
Make the Semi's of the 20/20 - $250,000
Option B:
Finish top half in FC - $500,000
Avoid Relegation in OD - $250,000
Win the 20/20 - $600,000
Option C:
Runner Up (or better) in FC - $800,000
Finish Top in OD - $900,000
Make the KO stage of 20/20 - $100,000
Now you will be able to select what options you feel you will be able to achieve best for your season. Hopefully that makes more sense.
I dont see why its a joke, thats half the problem with the game now, the activity of some managers is pretty piss poor.. Its not hard to post up a little report or press release. Use a bit of imagination and put a storyline to the game and it will become much more enjoyable, and people will start to develop different personalities instead of being robots.Don't rate this at all even if it is a min amount of income. The principle is joke imo. I don't want to read a bunch of random pointless match reports and previews just so people can get money. Defeats the whole purpose of them.
You can do what you like, hoever once money is dedicated to a certain area, you will not be able to change it back.Sound good as I'm over trading and I will just put all the money to wages. Though I still have to make pointless trades prior to the draft, just to keep numbers even.
The squad limits would need to be discussed with Simon, but im sure it wouldnt be a major issue.Seriously for something like this you would probably need min and max squad numbers, rather then making everyone have 17 players. Some sides might rather use their wages for depth, some for massive superstars. Effectively though this is a cap i guess, that Jason wanted. Just not as specific as the Aussie caps, more an English Super League cap format I guess.
It would make trades even, But moreso would allow a lower division club a chance to pick up a top class player, whereas now they would stand no chance as they couldnt offer players good enough to certain teams..Should help make even trades, though how would draft trading come into this. Will their be basic range for each round of draft pick for trade to be accepted.
It would be based on player ability only, as it could be skewed as 1 player may be important to one team and not another, and with the way the wages would work it would need to be based totally on player ability.based on stats or importance to a team btw?
No they arent, and i cant understand why people are so against it TBH.. Its designed to get more activity from everyone, the place is like a graveyard sometimes and this would help boost the activity as well as allow people more input into their teams.The changes aren't as massive as I thought intially, depending on how things are implemented. Though still not for the financial side of game yet tbph.