benchmark00
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Errr...GoT_SpIn said:No he is just not good enough.
Errr...GoT_SpIn said:No he is just not good enough.
burkey_1988 said:Obviously Warne and Murali are the only word-class spinners of recent times. Then it's daylight to the lesser likes of Such, MacGill, Tufnell.
You clearly know your cricket.burkey_1988 said:Obviously Warne and Murali are the only word-class spinners of recent times. Then it's daylight to the lesser likes of Such, MacGill, Tufnell.
VVS Laxman might have something to say about that. But yeah, MacGill often does seem to get a raw deal. I am so sure he could have made a difference in the Ashes.FaaipDeOiad said:You can say that about every Australian player, can't you? Warne's success has mostly come with McGrath, McGrath's has come with Warne's, Gillespie with both of them, Lee with all three, etc.
Really, MacGill's done nothing wrong at any point in his career, and he's surely the best player in the world who isn't a test regular.
why do Kumble and Kaneria and Saqlain and Mushy and Harbhajan get left out like this?burkey_1988 said:Obviously Warne and Murali are the only word-class spinners of recent times. Then it's daylight to the lesser likes of Such, MacGill, Tufnell.
Aren't you usually face down biting the pillow anyway, burkey?burkey_1988 said:Ceiling mirrors ...
Is that a shirt lifted there to cover your face?Voltman said:Aren't you usually face down biting the pillow anyway, burkey?
Speaking from experience?burkey_1988 said:Is that a shirt lifted there to cover your face?
There have been plenty of times that MacGill has got wickets when other bowlers haven't looked like getting any. Two that come straight to mind is his 7-fer against the Windies at the SCG and his recent 8-fer against Bangladesh.marc71178 said:I actually think a lot of his success has come from being the weakest link in the attack since batsmen have to try and score runs from one of the bowlers...