Spitfires_Fan
State Vice-Captain
Not sure if this is the right place to post this, or if it's been discussed before, but I've been wondering for some time why Private Messaging has been disabled?
Some people just used the feature to stalk the female members here.
NB. The above statement may or may not be true and the names of people have been changed to protect the innocent and the possibly, though not necessarily guilty.
I should have also added "Don't quote me on that!", but its too late now!
Helpful, thanks...!
By emailing them directly, seeing as a couple of the CW admin would have access to everyone's emails?How else do Moderators contact members with emails disabled without making it a public matter in a thread?
Thanks for the advice. I have one.Yeh i don't see the point in PM's anymore. Most of the people use MSN anyway if they want to communicate, if you don't use it and want to communicate to one of the gun members then freaking get a msn account.
AWTA, very strongly.Yeh i don't see the point in PM's anymore. Most of the people use MSN anyway if they want to communicate, if you don't use it and want to communicate to one of the gun members then freaking get a msn account.
If someone makes the choice not to give out their email, they forfeit the right to private conversation. I don't see anything wrong with that, personally. There's quite a few members on CW who don't want to give their email out and seem perfectly happy that the forum is their only method of communication with other CWers.PMs are necessary to be honest. Disabling them due to "foreigners" trying to recruit for their forum is silly. A lot of people prefer them over MSN, because they are internal and not everyone likes to give out their email.
Interestingly, the disabling of PMs was an action taken before every single one of the current female members (possibly bar 1) had joined the site.Some people just used the feature to stalk the female members here.
NB. The above statement may or may not be true and the names of people have been changed to protect the innocent and the possibly, though not necessarily guilty.