David
International 12th Man
I'm still at Redssteds said:What happened to spending time with God, Nathan?
I'm still at Redssteds said:What happened to spending time with God, Nathan?
Lol!David said:I'm still at Reds
There are a percentage of 'season injuries' IRL though.Nnanden said:I do believe that`s one thing that should be taken from the 'game'. Full-season injuries. They wreck it up bad, they do. Short-term injuries ****ed me off enough, if I got a long-term one I reckon I would`ve died. Though I do agree that short-term injuries make it more realistic.
Yeah, of course mate. I`m just saying, that for something like this, where participation is the key, it perhaps shouldn`t be a part of it. Imagine a poor rookie who had played like a few games and was just getting into it, but then got a huge injury. This would most likely see him leave CW Cricket and maybe CW all-together.AUST_HiTMaN said:There are a percentage of 'season injuries' IRL though.
Michael Clark - Retravision Warriors is the first who springs to mind.
He isage_master said:Lezama had a long term injury last season and was active throughout, great team man
Agreed completely.age_master said:Lezama had a long term injury last season and was active throughout, great team man
Even still. I don't think long term injuries should be taken out of the game. Perhaps they could be reduced, but they do happen.Loony BoB said:Ah, but you've been around for a long time, Wright. Like I said, some of us, yes, will easily hang around - but if you want to encourage participation, then you have to accept that it would be a lot easier if you didn't have such long-term injuries. If you're happy to just carry on losing the interest of players with less enthusiasm than the top 20-30 members, then go right ahead and keep things as they are.
Scathing. I entirely agree though.Loony_BoB said:If you're happy to just carry on losing the interest of players with less enthusiasm than the top 20-30 members, then go right ahead and keep things as they are.