That was a wonderful knock against a very good attack. I also remember him playing in Aus during 1994/5, batting very well with Atherton to rebuild after early wickets and set up a decent score in the test which we actually went on to win, IIRC. At one stage I thought he would go on to be the real deal, until the Australians found him out in 1997. He has probably been unlucky not to play more tests, though, when you consider how many one or two others have played.Beleg said:What I remember of him (Crawley) is a big century against Pakistan in 1996, and that was a super fine knock regardless of how he might have fared against other countries.
Wasn't he also Opening for AUCK during his stint opening in Tests - or did that follow his selection at intnl level??????Kent said:Trying to turn a flawed, attention-loving strokemaker into an opener (with a partner like Richardson) was always doomed in hindsight. Averaging over 30 was surprisingly high in the end.
overated???? more like underated.!!!deeps said:alex tudor as a bowler and proobably as a batsman too (his 99 :P)
marc71178 said:Viv did somewhat tail off towards the end - maybe should've retired a bit earlier.
Haha! This thread is about players who went downhill after excellent starts to their test careers.The Baconator said:out of current players i think it may happen 2 graeme smith and mattie hayden may get worse and perhaps retire after he should have
I'm assuming he means downhill from the double centuries he took off the English pies in 2003.Craig said:Since when has Graeme Smith gone downhill?
Smith's Test career v Australia didn't excatly set the world alight.