• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Players who could be other players

cnerd123

likes this
I think a lot of people have already drawn the Slater/Sehwag parallel

Warner/Hayden another duo in my mind.
 

stephen

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
I think a lot of people have already drawn the Slater/Sehwag parallel

Warner/Hayden another duo in my mind.
Interesting. Warner and Hayden are both physically very different despite being left handed.
 

ankitj

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Here are few pair of players I almost always connect in my head:


  • Greame Pollock and George Headley -- near identical test batting average in nearly same number of games, careers curtailed by politics/war.
  • Clive Lloyd and Neil Harvey -- both left handed batsmen regarded as great even though their batting averages were just shy of 50.
  • Bruce Mitchell and Dudley Nourse -- both SA legends from their early years.
Also, Steve Waugh and Allan Border. Dogged middle order batsmen for who played a lot of games at 5 or 6, without much flair were super effective at what they did, averaged very similar, senior statesmen for their teams for a long period. Great captains.
 

AndrewB

International Vice-Captain
Here are few pair of players I almost always connect in my head:


  • Greame Pollock and George Headley -- near identical test batting average in nearly same number of games, careers curtailed by politics/war.
  • Clive Lloyd and Neil Harvey -- both left handed batsmen regarded as great even though their batting averages were just shy of 50.
  • Bruce Mitchell and Dudley Nourse -- both SA legends from their early years.
I tend to connect/confuse Mitchell with Herbie Taylor - both openers, both played 42 Tests for SA over about 20 years interrupted by war.
 

mr_mister

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Mead and Hendren are similar in my mind. At first Class level were total equals to the big 4 of Hobbs, Sutcliffe, Hammond and Hutton. In fact Mead and Hendren cracked 150 FC tons which eluded Sutcliffe and Hutton(Sutton got 149 and Hutton even less but obviously lost prime years to the war)

It was just at test level where they had a bit less success due to limited opportunities, but by no means did either have bad test careers, just obviously not quite ATG
 

morgieb

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Interesting. Warner and Hayden are both physically very different despite being left handed.
Hayden and Smith seem fairly similar. Both big, left-handed, front foot oriented openers who while not sloggers were rather aggressive scorers.
 

stephen

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Hayden and Smith seem fairly similar. Both big, left-handed, front foot oriented openers who while not sloggers were rather aggressive scorers.
Yeah that thought has occurred to me on occasion. Hayden the more brutal bat but Smith the leader.
 

Daemon

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Dravid and Pujara

Soft spoken defensive Indian no.3s who are often overshadowed by the fan favourite no.4.
 

stephen

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Dravid and Pujara

Soft spoken defensive Indian no.3s who are often overshadowed by the fan favourite no.4.
Yeah there's not too much to separate them in my mind, except I rate Pujara slightly higher than Dravid, entirely because of how he was the difference between winning and losing two series against Australia. Not many batsman can make that claim.
 

Daemon

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Bold call. Personally think Pujara's still well behind. Dravid never got to play an Australia as weak with a bowling attack as strong.
 

vcs

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Dravid technically was a much better batsman, even though he was only really prolific in England/NZ/WI out of the non-Asian countries. Pujara can bully spinners at home much better though.
 

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Pujara isnt even in the same stratosphere imo. He doesn't get called an htb because he's got balls and tries to stick out tough conditions, but his technique is far too limiting to be consistently effective in any non-road overseas conditions. Also because he's a good bloke and has acne issues which a lot of nerds relate to.
 

mr_mister

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Dravid technically was a much better batsman, even though he was only really prolific in England/NZ/WI out of the non-Asian countries. Pujara can bully spinners at home much better though.
So that's basically saying he was prolific everywhere except SA in Aus?
 

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Even the ton Pujara got in England, that was not some typical English deck, it was basically a subcontinental pitch. He's not just slightly flawed overseas, he's genuinely poor in non-Asian conditions.

Put him on a slow pitch which helps the spinners though, and he's one of the GOATs.
 

stephen

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Pujara isnt even in the same stratosphere imo. He doesn't get called an htb because he's got balls and tries to stick out tough conditions, but his technique is far too limiting to be consistently effective in any non-road overseas conditions. Also because he's a good bloke and has acne issues which a lot of nerds relate to.
Intellectually I know this, but emotionally he's been the difference between two series victories for Australia and two series defeats.
 

Top