IMHO Twose would have had more test success if he'd been able to have a regular #5 / #6 slot. He suffered from the NZ test middle logjam, Fleming - Astle - McMillan - Cairns, so was forced to open in half of his test matches.Twose was my favourite player for a long time.
Exceptional fielder also.
I consider Lax as an Australia specialist in ODIs. He averages 46 against them at a SR of 77. Even scored 4 of his 6 hundreds against them.VVS Laxman is a shout too - 45 average in tests but just scrapes an average of 30 in ODIs with a SR of 71.
Came here to post this! And what makes Laxman's record in ODIs even weird is that he averaged over 46 against the best side of his time, Australia!VVS Laxman is a shout too - 45 average in tests but just scrapes an average of 30 in ODIs with a SR of 71.
45.97. I also thought it was higher, but seems not.And he averages 45 in tests? Wasn't it 50 something?
Largely a product of his dire run in his first few test matches. Since 2000, he averaged very close to 50 in tests (spanning well over a 100 matches)45.97. I also thought it was higher, but seems not.
Erm, Strauss? And I think you've got Ajay Jadeja the wrong way around...I will rule out T20 as its not really a thing yet, and wasn't even around for most of the names mentioned here.
Good in tests but not ODIs
Laxman
Lara
Langer
Steve Waugh
Ganguly
Gavaskar
Ajay Jadeja
Shane Warne
Good in ODIs but not Tests
Yuvraj Singh
Raina
Ravinder Jadeja
James Faulkner
Shane Watson
David Miller
Vaughan
Strauss
Martin Guptill
Shahid Afridi