Alastair Cook 5 - big disappointment for England, Australia bowled well at him and didn't give him any areas where he could murder the bowling. Nevertheless, he did play some decent innings, which were key in a series with many close tests.
Joe Root 5 - one big innings, but little else. Seemed to grind a lot, but more often than not fell cheaply. Even in his big innings he got an early let-off.
Jonathon Trott 4.5 - not much to talk about. Annoyingly for England, he often got good starts and looked set to score big ones, but threw them away. Again, in many ways was a victim of good bowling.
Kevin Pietersen 7 - England's second best batsman after Bell. Played quite a few crucial knocks, and was probably England's most aggressive batsman. Didn't really light that many Christmas trees though.
Ian Bell 9.5 - almost perfect. Whenever England needed runs, he came to the show, every knock this series being crucial. Hard to think of many better series with the bat. Loses half a mark if only because he didn't score a daddy hundred.
Jonathon Bairstow 3.5 - very surprised he averaged 29. Looked at sea all series, and while he's likely to get future chances he needs a lot of work. I suppose he did have the odd key knock though.
Matt Prior 4 - was largely awful with the bat all series, though did look better in the final test. Was OK with the gloves.
Stuart Broad 8 - only really bowled well in one Test (Durham), but my god he was good there. Did seem to bowl well without reward in most Tests, and had a key knack of working out Clarke. Played one absolutely crucial knock with the bat.
Graeme Swann 8 - probably England's most consistent bowler, have to admit I was wrong here. Figures arguably flattered him, as he did get an advantage in bowling against a poor batting lineup, but that shouldn't take anything away from him. Well played.
Jimmy Anderson 7.5 - one lethal Test (Trent Bridge), but other than that was inconsistent. Played well in London, but looked tired in the other two Tests.
Steven Finn 1.5 - horrendous. Did get a couple of breakthroughs, but almost cost England a match they should never have really lost.
Tim Bresnan 7 - plenty of key all-round performances. England's firefighter with the ball, he often was the one that got a key breakthrough for his more heralded team-mates to capitalise on.
Chris Woakes 5 - meh. Took a hammering initially, but then his bowling recovered. Batted OK in both innings. Unconvinced he's test-class though.
Simon Kerrigan 0 - deary me. You have to feel for him, and hopefully his cards aren't marked.
Chris Rogers 8 - excellent. His figures don't show how well he batted, he often got his sides off to good starts (for Australia to waste) and he was that solid figure our top-order was crying out for. Did have well documented problems with Swann, but hopefully he'll learn how to cope in the meantime.
Shane Watson 6.5 - largely poor in the first three tests, with his tenancy to expose his front pad being willfully exploited despite mostly making good starts, however this did improve over time. Bowling has lost a lot of its bite, perhaps due to injuries, but did keep things tight.
Ed Cowan 2 - probably had to go, really. Not the way forward for Australia, due to his age and mediocre record.
Michael Clarke 7 - one excellent innings, but a disappointment compared to what we are used to from him. His back seemed to hinder him, particularly against Broad, though in his defence he did recieve a lot of jaffas, so England deserve a lot of credit for nullifying Australia's main bat.
Steve Smith 8 - very good from the People's Champ. Despite various technical flaws, he made some key knocks, and got a century for his trouble. Nice part-time bowling too.
Phil Hughes 4.5 - I shudder to think what would've happened at Trent Bridge without him, but was awful at Lords. In hindsight was unlucky to be turfed for Khawaja, but his cards seem marked for the near future.
Brad Haddin 5.5 - very good with the gloves, some of the catches he took were screamers and you can clearly tell the difference between him and Wade. Couple of good knocks, but did little after Old Trafford.
Ashton Agar 5 - well batted at Trent Bridge, but still needs a lot of work to be done with the ball. Still very young, but I worry he'll go down the route of the Rashids and Vettoris of this world.
Mitchell Starc 6 - strange series. Probably gave England their most pies, but still took wickets. Harshly treated by many here though, I don't think his inconsistency is half as bad as the other Mitchell. Batting was fun.
Peter Siddle 7.5 - mostly excellent in the first three Tests but did slip quite significantly in the last two Tests. Was he tired? Or did England work him out?
James Pattinson 5 - was pretty meh, though injury didn't help and did sometimes seem an unlucky bowler.
Usman Khawaja 2 - largely terrible. One decent innings, which even then was after the game was long gone, and a lot of failures. Surely his cards have been marked.
Ryan Harris 9.5 - I don't think he bowled badly all series. Was simply mint, and his fitness and management will be crucial in Australia.
David Warner 4 - one key innings, but little else. In his defense he did have to bat in 'hiding to nothing' kind of situations a few times.
Nathan Lyon 7 - the decision to dump him for Agar was a terrible one. Was very good with the ball, and probably would've taken even more wickets if he was bowling against Australia's batting line-up.
Jackson Bird 2.5 - nothing to write home about, really. Rightly or wrongly probably has slipped in the pecking order.
James Faulkner 8 - did what needed to be done. Still shouldn't be picked in Australia barring injury though.