Because we all know ball tampering and reverse swinging beamers are the same as time limit in test cricket.Definitely. If no rules there will be bottle cps around and it will be very rarely a match will last 5 days. Not to mention reverse swinging beamers.
Rules are there. **** happens, deal with it.
You're basically talking peak vs career?Ugh, I can't think how to properly explain it.
Take the gloves off and it gets real impressive, real quick, against allcomers. While his record against SA in SA is not Bradmanesque, more than few top flight batsmen would take that record .You're basically talking peak vs career?
mm thats a century every 2 and a half matches. Don't think anyone ever had such a sustained peak besides Bradman, maybe Ponting? (correct me if I'm wrong). Though to be more accurate you'd probably do it after he gave up the gloves for good. Last time he was consistently keeping was against England in 06.Take the gloves off and it gets real impressive, real quick, against allcomers. While his record against SA in SA is not Bradmanesque, more than few top flight batsmen would take that record .
Batting records | Test matches | Cricinfo Statsguru | ESPN Cricinfo
Cos its fun to talk about Sangakkara. When was the last time anyone seriously compared them?Why is this thread still alive omg
Yeah - Pieterson averages 47 as a batsman with 38 in the second innings, and 44 away with 11 at neutral venues.
Sangakarra verages 69 as a batsman with 54 in the second innings (average includes his 48 wicket keeping matches) and 53 away including his 48 wicket keeping matches) with 62 in neutral.
There really is no contest. Personally, I really enjoy watching both of them bat. Both very easy on the eye and great players of the modern generation. But - Sangakarra wins this by the length of Flemington Straight.
For me, Sanga defecates all over Tendulkar's record, but Sri Lanka does not have the fan base or money that India does. So we will hear about Tendulkar ad nauseam until Kohli starts to threaten his record. Then we will hear about Kohli ad nauseam.
Ha!Dont be so sure... Tendulkar fanboyism >>>> India fanboyism... I already have cousins who are discussing why Rohit is better than Kohli... Only because in a few other circles, there is talk of Kohli being a better ODI bat than Sachin....
This is a really weird post. There are tons of Indians who already consider Kohli at Tendulkar's level in ODIs.Dont be so sure... Tendulkar fanboyism >>>> India fanboyism... I already have cousins who are discussing why Rohit is better than Kohli... Only because in a few other circles, there is talk of Kohli being a better ODI bat than Sachin....
This is a really weird post. There are tons of Indians who already consider Kohli at Tendulkar's level in ODIs.
This is a really weird post. There are tons of Indians who already consider Kohli at Tendulkar's level in ODIs.
But he isn't better, not yet. Why expect people to rate Kohli higher than Sachin when he objectively isn't? It's like hb is saying people refusing to rate Kohli higher only do so because of their Tendulkar fanboyism. SUch nonsense.He said "better" not on the same level.
But he isn't better, not yet. Why expect people to rate Kohli higher than Sachin when he objectively isn't? It's like hb is saying people refusing to rate Kohli higher only do so because of their Tendulkar fanboyism. SUch nonsense.
It is but natural that the generation that grew up watching, idolizing Sachin consider Kohli, the upstart brat, as inferior to Sachin. Just wait a few years and we would see a lot more saying Kohli >>>> Tendulkar.