• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Pick which side is better (between these two 90s and 2010s teams)

Best team out of A and B

  • Team A

    Votes: 10 90.9%
  • Team B

    Votes: 1 9.1%

  • Total voters
    11

Kenneth Viljoen

International Regular
Team A has a better bowling attack , better star batsmen , better variety , and I would say better chemistry, a lot of the players in Team A compliment each other's strengths .
 

shortpitched713

International Captain
Second thought bowling attack of A is probably too strong. Replace Broad for say Cummins or Rabada, and I think the second side is definitely more than competitive. Broad seems the one obvious one to attack though, in the current lineup.
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
Assuming Taylor gets the captaincy, 90s team wins handedly 3-1 in a series. His tactical brilliance will make Kohli seem like a schoolboy.
 

capt_Luffy

Cricketer Of The Year
I would say the overall battings are equalish, will probably give the edge to B for ABD; but A's bowling blows B way out of the water. I know both did not do anything in the 2010s, but had Cummins and Bumrah were in B for the English pair (especially one for Broad); it would had been much closer.
 

Top