Wasn't that pretty much how it was though, before the new five run penalty?Burgey said:Why would an umpire think about laying a charge? Seems the ball tampering issue will go the way of others like throwing, with the umpires nothaving the power to rule on it and the matter onlybeing dealt with later.
I was about to say...is that actually a news article?Slow Love™ said:but a bit of a funny "opinion piece" from Conn.
Sure, Site problems changed the title of the thread as well.FaaipDeOiad said:I'd say it has more to do with the problems the site has been having than any desperation to badmouth Pakistan. Lots of double posting and so on recently.
typical mud-slinging effort (and inaccurate as well, india won the world championship of cricket tourney in australia in 1985 and a couple of asia cups, a rothmans cup, a sharjah cup etc etc....since) from the jerk....i'm sure the jerks in the bcci will respond in kind...Slow Love™ said:Unassociated to this, some bizarre comments from Speed near the bottom of the article. Par for the course though, I suppose.
Speed clearly said an ICC event and he is right India has not won any ICC event since 1983. Although we did share the trophy with SriLanka after the finals were washed out.Anil said:typical mud-slinging effort (and inaccurate as well, india won the world championship of cricket tourney in australia in 1985 and a couple of asia cups, a rothmans cup, a sharjah cup etc etc....since) from the jerk....i'm sure the jerks in the bcci will respond in kind...![]()
aren't those icc events? what is the difference?Sanz said:Speed clearly said an ICC event and he is right India has not won any ICC event since 1983. Although we did share the trophy with SriLanka after the finals were washed out.
To be fair, probably implies he tried to rename the title after it seemed the first one didn't go through. I've done it myself, but you're best off loading the page in between just to make sure the first one didn't get posted.Sanz said:Sure, Site problems changed the title of the thread as well.
Thread didnt appear after initial post, so went back and did it againSanz said:You must be desperate to badmouth Pakistan and hence two threads on same topic. Here is the report :-
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,20685207-2722,00.html
The ICC last night insisted that no charges had been laid, with ICC cricket manager Dave Richardson refusing to comment on any particular incident.
"During the course of a match, umpires routinely inspect the ball and speak to the (fielding) captain," Richardson said last night.
Events like those are not promoted by ICC, sure they still come under ICC's jurisdiction as far as cricket rules, appointing umpires etc, but they are arranged by individual boards as opposed to ICC WC/CT.Anil said:aren't those icc events? what is the difference?
Fair Enough, I apologize for my rude post.social said:Thread didnt appear after initial post, so went back and did it again
BTW, do u really think Pakistan need my help in lowering their image any further?
ok got it...went back and re-read that article...still didn't see where he specified icc events though...even if he did, what is the relevance of icc events vs non-icc events as long as it is a legitimate cricketing event? doesn't performance in non-icc events count? of course it does...Sanz said:Events like those are not promoted by ICC, sure they still come under ICC's jurisdiction as far as cricket rules, appointing umpires etc, but they are arranged by individual boards as opposed to ICC WC/CT.
You little child you.Sanz said:Sure, Site problems changed the title of the thread as well.
I think Speed did say ICC event (According to Cricinfo). Modi has accused ICC of under-selling ICC events like World Cups and CT, and that's probably is the reason for Speed's swipe about India not winning an ICC event.Anil said:ok got it...went back and re-read that article...still didn't see where he specified icc events though...even if he did, what is the relevance of icc events vs non-icc events as long as it is a legitimate cricketing event? doesn't performance in non-icc events count? of course it does...
ok now i understand the context...i was just going off of that article...the way these two stupid organizations are "flexing their muscles" these days, they should definitely be tested for illegal steroid use....Sanz said:I think Speed did say ICC event (According to Cricinfo). Modi has accused ICC of under-selling ICC events like World Cups and CT, and that's probably is the reason for Speed's swipe about India not winning an ICC event.