Neil Pickup
Request Your Custom Title Now!
All set for an England v West Indies final, then... who'd have predicted that?!
Yet he contributed little in the West Indies wins against England earlier this year. Interesting comment that.Sanz said:Yes, It wont be a contest without him.
That weighed against...Sanz said:Because Pakistan are poor chasers. In the past Pakistani captains have been hounded for electing to field after winning the toss.
Well there is a difference in the way England are playing right now. Although it's more or less the same team, but everyone seem to be clicking even Vaughan.Mr Mxyzptlk said:Yet he contributed little in the West Indies wins against England earlier this year. Interesting comment that.
It was a poor decision no doubt. But from 65/1 to 131 all out. I dont think it was because of the conditions. Pakistan has huge problems in chasing, In the last match against India they almost lost(thanks for those Afridi Sixes) chasing 200 .Mr Mxyzptlk said:That weighed against...
1/ Ball is seaming a lot and you've picked 4 seamers.
2/ West Indies batting lineup can be pressured by quality pace.
3/ West Indies is MUCH better at chasing than defending.
4/ West Indies has 2 specialist bowlers in their team.
Doesn't seem enough justification IMO. Stupid decision.
Well I did predict half of that pairingNeil Pickup said:All set for an England v West Indies final, then... who'd have predicted that?!
Except Solanki, who is fast becoming the Phil Neville of English Cricket.Sanz said:Well there is a difference in the way England are playing right now. Although it's more or less the same team, but everyone seem to be clicking even Vaughan.
It would be an idiot to say that the West Indian performance - bowling, fielding and batting - was average.maxpower said:like i had said pak batsmen will make WI's average bowling look spectacular, and that came true. where's my boy from texas ?
Admittedly Vaughan had an outstanding game against the Aussies, but 1 or 2 good games does not equate 'clicking'.Sanz said:Well there is a difference in the way England are playing right now. Although it's more or less the same team, but everyone seem to be clicking even Vaughan.
Form is temporary, Liam - who knows what's likely to happen on Saturday when the two best teams of the tournament meet?Mr Mxyzptlk said:Admittedly Vaughan had an outstanding game against the Aussies, but 1 or 2 good games does not equate 'clicking'.
In his last 6 games he's scored 0, 4, 74, 17, 5, 86. He's played a couple of good innings, but he needs to do it more consistently first.
Yes, Michael Vaughan is a class batsman... in Tests. I'm not sold on him in ODIs yet. With his talent he should be scoring at least 40 per innings in ODIs, but he's under 25 atm and been around the mid20s for most of his career.luckyeddie said:Form is temporary, Liam - who knows what's likely to happen on Saturday when the two best teams of the tournament meet?
(hey, that sounds pretty good)