Exactly. Malik may not be the best batsman in the world but he is a fighter to the core and thats what we need.FRAZ said:After this series,I guess Malik and Hafeez should become the permanent openers for a while . Sick and tired now ......
Kick Butt and Farhat please !!!!
Malik
Hafeez
Younis (one down)
So basically you believe Pak should continue with 2-10 pattern.Beleg said:Asif
Shoaib
Inzamam
Younis
Yousuf
Malik
Akmal
Afridi
Razzaq
Rana/Nazir
Kaneria
Interesting . I some what agree with this . But I guess Hafeez has been under - rated . He has a good technique . Taufeeq is just plain ridiculous at times ...Goughy said:It would be interesting to see Afridi given a go at opening. Im not saying he would be a success but he could not do worse than the current guys and he would give England something to think about at the top of the order.
Would probably fail but worth a go given the current situation.
Some times I think like you Beleg . I do man .. I mean why in the name of hell in this whole wide world only it is Pakistan who has this opening problem for such a long time man .Beleg said:Asif
Shoaib
Inzamam
Younis
Yousuf
Malik
Akmal
Afridi
Razzaq
Rana/Nazir
Kaneria
Same here, but its so mind boggling to see him struggle so much after such a promising start against Aus in his first ever series. I remember Ian Chappel mentioning that he has not seen any other opening bat apart from Michal Vaughan who handles him so well in Australia.Jono said:Salman Butt has been a massive disappointment. I really predicted good things from him, and whilst I still think he has a big future in the limited overs game, and he's clearly still young, his test career looks like it won't be taking off for a while.
afridi # 1Beleg said:Asif
Shoaib
Inzamam
Younis
Yousuf
Malik
Akmal
Afridi
Razzaq
Rana/Nazir
Kaneria
Pardon me, but why have you got both Shoaib and Malik in the team? Is Malik batting at two places? Or do you have Shoaib Akhtar opening? Good attempth, though.Beleg said:Asif
Shoaib
Inzamam
Younis
Yousuf
Malik
Akmal
Afridi
Razzaq
Rana/Nazir
Kaneria
No, what counts is runs scored, not six hitting potential.Arjun said:As for Afridi, he's got a lot of value as a stock spinner, but since they've already got Kaneria, there may be a problem playing two leg-spinners, but at six/seven/eight, he can be quite destructive, which counts.
They've got five specialist batsmen, a wicketkeeper who can score lots of runs, and a stock seamer who can also score in chunks. They're the ones who have to score runs.marc71178 said:No, what counts is runs scored, not six hitting potential.
So the other 4 don't need to then?Arjun said:They've got five specialist batsmen, a wicketkeeper who can score lots of runs, and a stock seamer who can also score in chunks. They're the ones who have to score runs.