cnerd123
likes this
Nope -Yes, but they're being rated for best ever keeper not best ever keeper-batsman.
Let people vote based on whatever criteria they want to vote based on. If someone reckons batting factors into the equation, let them vote that way. If people want to vote on glovework alone, so be it.
And since the colloquial use of the term 'wicketkeeper' broadly encompasses all those who can and cannot bat, I factor batting in.yeah that might be the best option. allows me to avoid a potentially very divisive decision
Really though; how often do you really here media, commentators and even players try and distinguish between 'wicketkeeper' and 'wicketkeeper-batsman'? Any bowler who can bat or any batsman who regularly contributes as a fifth bowler are quick to be labelled as 'allrounders', and we allowed such players in the allrounders voting.