Should've gone to specsavers.Brilliant victory well done the team!
I felt Zimbabwe lacked bowling options
Apart from Creamer there wasn't another bowler who can be troublesome for the batsmen.
Btw it was Cremers first fifer.
Regarding the third umpire decision that was touch and go,there was something behind the crease
Yeah I'm concerned about them tbh. Zimbabwe did play well but they basically have one bowler in their lineup and SL still struggled to beat them. Since that Australia whitewash (which looks even more hilarious now), they've been absolutely awful.Little for Sri Lanka to celebrate really, Zimbabwe are a mediocre team who most certainly have not become a passable cricket team overnight. Highly concerned for Sri Lanka, if this is their level, then cricket has another West Indies which is something the sport does not need whatsoever.
Nah they will be alright their biggest problem is Matthews and Chandimal have not picked up the mantle from Mahela & Sanga but then these were massive shoes to fill and even if the duo can average mid 40's they will have a fruitful career however I like their upcoming crop Mendis, Dick, Gunarate, Dhanjaya,Gunathilika and Perrera are all players with good-great potential and one they have more experience them along with Matthews and Chandfmal is a good strong batting line up with depth in bench.Little for Sri Lanka to celebrate really, Zimbabwe are a mediocre team who most certainly have not become a passable cricket team overnight. Highly concerned for Sri Lanka, if this is their level, then cricket has another West Indies which is something the sport does not need whatsoever.
You can't always go by the names on the sheet though. The performance in this match from Zimbabwe has been excellent. Ervine on Day 1, Raza on Day 4. These are excellent performances, irrespective of their career stats and names.Little for Sri Lanka to celebrate really, Zimbabwe are a mediocre team who most certainly have not become a passable cricket team overnight. Highly concerned for Sri Lanka, if this is their level, then cricket has another West Indies which is something the sport does not need whatsoever.
No surprise3 out of 4 instances involve Bangladesh
When underdogs came painfully close | Cricket | ESPN Cricinfo
lmfao @ having a different award for MOTM and MOTS for a one-off Test in the first place, let alone it being won by different playersSo Guarante won MOTM but Herath MOTS....how does that work?
Biggest backhanded compliment I've read in yearsThey will be okay. Not like there are a lot of other sports they are good at as a country, much like India. They will begin their climb back up when competent people run the board once again.
I've tried to decipher this decision a little too much and I just can't think of a logical answer. It's like Gunaratne won player of day 5, Heath was the player of the game.So Guarante won MOTM but Herath MOTS....how does that work?