Burgey
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Yeah sorry, was a collective "you" rather than a specific one. My bad.Well I don't think any forum regular would mistake me for an England fan.
Yeah sorry, was a collective "you" rather than a specific one. My bad.Well I don't think any forum regular would mistake me for an England fan.
I could go down the list of AUS players but I looked at where Pat Cummins was schooled - a private school in Sydney.Don't even know why you follow the sport in England tbh. It's like rugby here. Just bin it - no one cares about Rah Rah here. Cricket should be like that there too. But it's a deficiency in English culture that for some reason your toffs are still treated like real people, whereas here they get torn down and ripped to shreds, as it should be.
I look at people on here who are obviously of working class background in the UK, yet they still back this pack of elitist grubs. Why? What's wrong with you all? You've been brainwashed. You should all rebel and start supporting Australia, the home of the fair go and the working class champion.
I am not talking top vs top though. How about the average professional? My feeling is that the discriminatory stuff in sports, irrespective of countries, tend to happen where there is most money to be made.Not really. I'm sure the top players get really well paid but I'd imagine no better than very good NRL and AFL players maybe not even as much. A marquee NRL player can pull down close to a million a year just in their contract, AFL players probably more. I'd imagine the top cricketers here get paid more than any of them tbh.
It's less about pay and more about pathways and exposure. It's hard to find a decent junior rugby team to even play with these days that's reasonably resourced and competitive if you aren't a rich private school kid.I assume its a money thing though. Doesn't rugby pay better in Australia?
Yeah I think @Spark pretty well nailed it. I would think yer average AFL and NRL player probably earns as much as a Super Rugby player, even allowing for there being five rugby teams at that level compared with 17 or 18 clubs in each of the other competitions. Club rugby guys get played very little unless they take the step up to Super rugby level.I am not talking top vs top though. How about the average professional? My feeling is that the discriminatory stuff in sports, irrespective of countries, tend to happen where there is most money to be made.
It's less about pay and more about pathways and exposure. It's hard to find a decent junior rugby team to even play with these days that's reasonably resourced and competitive if you aren't a rich private school kid.
By no means is rugby a rich sport in this country - that moniker belongs to AFL, and by a long way. In fact the financially parlous state of rugby in Australia is a big reason why no one is doing anything to change the situation, because those rich private schools are the only source of reliable talent and funding they have left.
Ah, its a little different then. I tend to think the discrimination is usually more when there is more money to be made and a place that is not all that well paying may not be something such folks would be desperate to control etc. Obviously, this shows that is not always the case.Yeah I think @Spark pretty well nailed it. I would think yer average AFL and NRL player probably earns as much as a Super Rugby player, even allowing for there being five rugby teams at that level compared with 17 or 18 clubs in each of the other competitions. Club rugby guys get played very little unless they take the step up to Super rugby level.
It's just a very competitive football market here with four professional codes. AFL is in front nationally, then NRL. These days I would even say the A League has it over Rugby from an interest POV, even though all the good Aus association football players head overseas to make decent coin.
And you spend most of your time mocking them for living in cities that were built for working people and not somewhere with enough hacky wine bars for your snobbish ****en takes. Give me a break you ****ing hypocrite.I look at people on here who are obviously of working class background in the UK,
I dunno if we have more access at a pathways level, but its probably something more freely enjoyed here among the general public. Mind you, the amount of people I can talk cricket with I can probably count on one hand.Let's compare Australia and England at cricket. The UK population is roughly 3 times that of Australia.
Yet for the most part, they have a stronger cricket team than us - now why is that?
Is it because their population is just more talented at the game. Or could it be that the vast majority of their population have access to the game whereas here that is only available to a small % of the population.
Answers on a postcard please.
Nice enough school but no EtonI could go down the list of AUS players but I looked at where Pat Cummins was schooled - a private school in Sydney.