• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** Women's Ashes 2017/18

Dan

Hall of Fame Member
Yeah stupid of them to prepare such a flat wicket but they got away with it because the most high profile player of the match hit an amazing double century.
It's North Sydney Oval. Pretty sure they transplant the deck from the Freeway over the fence.
 

S.Kennedy

International Vice-Captain
The Australians are saying that England (2.4 runs per over) ruined the test through negative play, despite the fact Australia themselves only went at a barely better 2.6 per over, and that the strike rates between the two teams are all very similar (Sarah Taylor and Heather Knight went at a similar strike-rate to Perry). Maybe your curators should create better wickets?
 

cnerd123

likes this
Why did you score so slowly?
They bowled negatively!

Why did they score so slowly?
They batted negatively!

Typical Aussies.
 

S.Kennedy

International Vice-Captain
There is not much between them throughout this Ashes but Australia have that extra cutting edge.
 

_Ed_

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Entertaining game last night. Watching Danielle Wyatt, I found it pretty hard to believe she'd never scored a 50 in international cricket before. Superb innings.
 

Spikey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
healy is really making clarkeh taste it after he said she was one of the best keepers
 

Top