Yeah, all true IMO.The danger ball to Papps isn't the bouncer per se, but the back of a length delivery or the good length delivery from a bowler who gets good bounce. Papps subscribes to "if in doubt, get forward" and so he defends and attacks almost everything on the front foot. Papps pulls on the front foot, which is fine against some bowlers on some pitches but is suicide in South Africa or Australia where he had the misfortune to play the majority of his international cricket.
Somewhere in the depths of the vault there is footage of Mitch M getting a length delivery to rise and nip back. Papps comes forward but the ball beats him through the gate and knocks the stumps over. That or the nick to slip from similar bowling has always bee the quintessential Papps dismissal to me.
I presume we're excluding Bangladesh and Zimbabwe from that, because they've had some absolute shockers in the last few years.Struggling to remember a poorer performance from a specialist fast bowler tbh.
Yeah same.Big innings for Baz here.
Must say, I've enjoyed Cairns on commentary.
Wait so McCullum has played 80 tests without missing one?That is a pretty amazing statistic. 80 consecutive tests, especially for a New Zealander.
Fair point! It has certainly been up there though. Awful stuff and New Zealand should really have made more of the gifts that have been on offer. Fulton and Rutherford were very poor dismissals. Still, I would prefer to be in their position. Runs on the board and the two senior batsmen at the wicket.I presume we're excluding Bangladesh and Zimbabwe from that, because they've had some absolute shockers in the last few years.
Rory Kleinveldt's Test debut was particularly bad.
Yeah this.Yeah very impressive.
I've always believed McCullum is at his best when he's taking regular singles, whether in ODIs or tests, because it shows he's not bouncing around doing weird things, not going hard at the ball, not in 666666 mode and not in "must b responsibubble and block EVERYTHING" mode.