• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** West Indies in New Zealand 2013/14

hendrix

Hall of Fame Member
I'm not sure how feasible it is but yeah, it's really negative cricket and doesn't make for good viewing. There are already the body line-induced fielding laws that prevent too many behind square on the leg side, so there are runs to be had but they're inherently risky shots and it's not exactly getting the batsmen out by beating them.
 

Mike5181

International Captain
McCullum has two tons as a specialist batsman after 30 odd games and now bats in the easiest position possible. He was a world class keeper bat, is an astute skipper and was briefly a good opener but overall he isn't a very good specialist batsman and has undersold himself. I'm not calling for his head, but in an alternate universe where Watling forgets how to keep wicket tomorrow I'd rate him higher as a specialist batsman than McCullum. If his name wasn't McCullum he would be seriously under the gun.
Batting at number five is not easier than batting at seven.
 

Flem274*

123/5
Batting at number five is not easier than batting at seven.
5/6 since England home series is what I was getting at. And 7 is pretty tricky because you need to both marshall the tail and be the last line of defence or bring a chase home.

But yeah I'll concede batting at 5 is harder than I gave credit for due to the threat of 3 quick wickets, second new ball, spin etc.
 

Top