Pratters
Cricket, Lovely Cricket
There might be a difference in the way you and I think on it really. There is a huge difference between saying Chappell helped Ganguly like you said earlier and saying Chappell's actions indirectly meant Ganguly came out a stronger cricketer. As I mentioned, there were so many other factors which lead to it and even if there was no Chappell, I doubt if Ganguly would not have been dropped (in some time) from the test team if he kept scoring poorly and then come out stronger.Still, a coach can really help a player out by giving him time off and in that sense Chappell did Ganguly a favor (not everyone will understand, perhaps). By no means am I giving Chappell credit for the battle that Ganguly waged, but it's something that should be acknowledged IMO.
A lot of factors can indirectly lead to some thing but it is not that big usually as it appears to be. It is a bit over the top to say Chappell helped Ganguly though his actions might have indirectly lead to it. Ganguly's ascenedancy as Indian captained was hastened by the Azharuddin match fixing fiasco. So did Azharuddin help Ganguly? Ganguly was dropped from the team after 1991-92. So did those people help Ganguly?
If Chappell had gone out of his way to chart out a plan for Ganguly (which may or maynot have included rest/dropping from the team) and helped Ganguly come back on track, I might have said Chappell helped Ganguly. However, he did not feel it necessary because he did not perceive Ganguly in the scheme of things. Ganguly's character and determination brought him back more than any thing and Chappell certainly didn't help Ganguly towards it. Help is a big word and it should be used very less when describing any one's actions.
Test cricket, like life, is all about character and usually, you help yourself more than any thing.
Last edited: