Just because he quoted you doesn't mean every line of his post was directed at you. I don't, personally, think he was being in the slightest nasty to you, and I genuinely do feel that the rolleyes should be used carefully. I'd have preferred the one in that instance, TBH.Er, he quoted me? And laughed. And suggested that I'd said something that I didn't. And I used a smiley consisting of a yellow face with rolling eyes. I don't know why you see it the way that you do, but personally, I don't consider it evil. If I could have been bothered, I'd have rolled my eyes when I saw his post because I thought it was misguided, and so it seemed the most relevant smiley to use.
Why? It's a smiley! How can that really cause any offence?!Just because he quoted you doesn't mean every line of his post was directed at you. I don't, personally, think he was being in the slightest nasty to you, and I genuinely do feel that the rolleyes should be used carefully. I'd have preferred the one in that instance, TBH.
The post wasn't directed at S_F at all...though I can see why it might give that impression. Ah, the perils of forumposting...Just because he quoted you doesn't mean every line of his post was directed at you. I don't, personally, think he was being in the slightest nasty to you, and I genuinely do feel that the rolleyes should be used carefully. I'd have preferred the one in that instance, TBH.
By the way," Tom says, "I'm 'revising' for an English Lit exam which is on Tuesday, so if you could possibly make the commentary of a particularly high literary standard today, I would feel a little bit better about following it, and not reading Dickens." Yeah whatever, innit. No problem Tom. We shall do our best.
Why? It's a smiley! How can that really cause any offence?!
And obviously I interpreted the post differently to you. Tbh, it's not really that important, so we probably shouldn't spam the thread with a load of 'he meant this' and 'I took it this way, and it really hurt my feelings' crap, especially as there is a test match going on. Just thought he was a bit out of order, that's all. Next time I'll take the high road and keep my mild irritation to myself.
Haha.ANyway...
We're scoring at a good rate here. Good to see.
Hey, you get a big integrated discussion here on the appropriate use of the rolleyes smilie AND the intended recipient of comments made on webfora, as free as it is eloquent, and you STILL want a bite from elsewhere?Wahey, just got a mention on cricinfo!
So it's Tom is it? Now we know - your'e anonymous no longer.Wahey, just got a mention on cricinfo!
Unless I'm just calling everyone's bluff and actually operating under 6 or 7 assumed names?So it's Tom is it? Now we know - your'e anonymous no longer.
Straus gone, nothing shot, to a nothing ball.
deja vu
So that'll be Joe Sayers in for Strauss then?Side needs some more northerners.