Lame, gotta come better than that yo..Aussie in 12 months time to go on a 'drop Hilf' campaign and cite this Test as being against a crap batting line-up so doesn't count.
TBH, that's not really a problem, there are other bowlers in with a decent shout. It's people belittling Hilf's performances when given the opportunity that grates.I'll put my hand up saying Hilf isn't in my starting XI.
Yeah, this. People decide long in advance that they'd prefer Bollinger or Clark or whoever in the team, and when Hilfenhaus puts the rest of the team to shame in the most important series there is, or when he takes three wickets in his opening spell, they come up with some excuse for why it doesn't count.TBH, that's not really a problem, there are other bowlers in with a decent shout. It's people belittling Hilf's performances when given the opportunity that grates.
He can bat at 8 and replace Benn.Chappell very wrong about Ganga being good enough to hold a place in the current WI team as batsman here.
Ganga had his share of flat wickets.He can bat at 8 and replace Benn.
Though really there isn't much of a difference between him and Nash, both limited and Nash has a good start to test cricket thanks to some nice flat wickets.
Dowlin's 32. Nice try anyway.If Sarwan is fit for the next Test, who will get dropped now that the two younger guys Barath and Dowlin have done quite well.
Will Bravo just take on the extra bowling workload instead of Taylor?
1 Barath 2 Gayle 3 Sarwan 4 Dowlin 5 Chanderpaul 6 Nash 7 Bravo 8 Ramdin 9 Benn 10 Roach 11 Rampaul/Tonge. .
Fairly weak bowling, the team above could draw a match in Aus, not so certain it would win a match.
Not as flat as the wickets seen when England last toured the Caribbean, even Ramdin was getting 150+ scores.Ganga had his share of flat wickets.
Younger as in least experienced.Dowlin's 32. Nice try anyway.
Reckon Dowlin will get the axe, as Barath's virtually carrying the innings.
Their probably aint much to separate Ganga & Nash indeed. But Ganga wasted alot of his chances others guys deserve a go now before he can ever be considered again TBF.He can bat at 8 and replace Benn.
Though really there isn't much of a difference between him and Nash, both limited and Nash has a good start to test cricket thanks to some nice flat wickets.
Pretty sure Ganga's batted at the ARG more than once.Not as flat as the wickets seen when England last toured the Caribbean, even Ramdin was getting 150+ scores.