brilliant.how was quinsy's 6 spikey?
He said it can be a good batting pitch, which is correct, there have been other high scoring matches at HobartGlenn McGrath called it a good pitch based on a run chase 13 years ago. Healy/McGrath garbage so far.
Didn't Ian Healy then give a stat about the average first innings score being really low?He said it can be a good batting pitch, which is correct, there have been other high scoring matches at Hobart
Yes, but the point was that Hobart could be a good batting wicket, not that it consistently is, and there is evidence to back that up. You really don't need to mis-represent those two to find faults in their commentaryDidn't Ian Healy then give a stat about the average first innings score being really low?
Fire alarm was better to listen to.
Well the point of averages is they generally show likelihood, so pulling out an example from 13 years ago seems rather pointless compared to say the average from this season.Yes, but the point was that Hobart could be a good batting wicket, not that it consistently is, and there is evidence to back that up. You really don't need to mis-represent those two to find faults in their commentary
Did the PM one day game. Don't remember the A game.Did Michael Atherton do a stint for Channel 9 in the A game 3 years ago or have I imagined that?
Yes but averages don't mention the fact that many Hobart pitches are lively on the first day but sometimes flatten out nicely as McGrath was eluding to, he used that example because he probably likes talking about that test match. Last season Australia scored 5-450 first innings and SL replied with about 320 if you want a recent example.Well the point of averages is they generally show likelihood, so pulling out an example from 13 years ago seems rather pointless compared to say the average from this season.
Think he did.Did Michael Atherton do a stint for Channel 9 in the A game 3 years ago or have I imagined that?