Arjun - Did it ever occur to you that MCG was a flat pitch full of runs and 222 was too small a target to defend against the World Champs on this batting paradise ?Arjun said:Why is everyone blaming the Indian batsmen for the failure? The bowling was far from ordinary- it was horrible! Especially the most experiened and accomplished pace bowler. Even Kumble was disappointing, but he was not 100% fit.
I think you're in a minority of about one here.Sanz said:JONO - I am not upset by the loss, I am upset by the humiliation. His performance on this tour has been a disgrace.
Trsut me there wont by any such riots if he is dropped. He has been a distraction all season. I have been keeping track of his performance since Indian tour of West Indies and I believe his time is over. This guy doesn't have any motivation left and gets low on confidence everytime he gets out. He is a major stumbling block in our plans of future.
So what? How is it that the Aussie bowlers could restrict the Indian batsmen for less than 250, while the Indians couldn't? Obviously good bowling by Gillespie and Lee, and rubbish bowling by Agarkar, Pathan and Balaji.Arjun - Did it ever occur to you that MCG was a flat pitch full of runs and 222 was too small a target to defend against the World Champs on this batting paradise ?
I know.Neil Pickup said:I think you're in a minority of about one here.
Only Dravid did. The others were done in by quality and power in bowling. Not to mention good fielding. Add Ponting's effective plans to that to get rid of Sachin, Sehwag and Laxman. Ganguly couldn't do much, since he was too defensive. If he handled these bowlers the way hw handled Flintoff, he'd be more effective. Compare this with the Indians on the field. What bowling? What fielding? What planning? They were just plain submissive.Arjun - Unlike the Australians, Our (top order) batsmen gifted their wickets on a platter and their defensive attitude sucked. You can continue to live in denial and blame the bowling.
What and Gilchrist didn't pummel the bowling today?ReallyCrazy said:The reason pathan didn't get the new ball was because gilchrist and hayden had pummeled him in the other games.
Yes they were plain submissive - From the first Ball we faced. Batting is our strength and we batted poorly.Arjun said:They were just plain submissive.
Was Agarkar particularly lethat with the new ball? Balaji had done his job, to some extent. Pathan was using the new ball in Perth to good effect.What and Gilchrist didn't pummel the bowling today?
Pathan has troubled Gilchrist at times - I recall a beautiful inswinger that bowled him neck and crop.......
What great thing did Yuvraj, far short of Test standard needed here, do to save the team? It was Badani who did something useful, apart from run out a few more batsmen.Well done to Yuvraj and Agarkar for restoring some respectability in the total.
It is surprising, even shocking, that a team with 7 batsmen can't reach 250 runs, even when batting first.Yes they were plain submissive - From the first Ball we faced. Batting is our strength and we batted poorly.
And that was unusual given the way the summer has gone for India - only Laxman (despite being sconed on the helmet - again) showed any authority really......Sanz said:Yes they were plain submissive - From the first Ball we faced. Batting is our strength and we batted poorly.
Sorry, I think I meant Badani - he did well to be there at the end - Yuvraj was the other guy besides Laxman who showed a bit of authority on occassions......Arjun said:What great thing did Yuvraj, far short of Test standard needed here, do to save the team? It was Badani who did something useful, apart from run out a few more batsmen.
[/B]
Yes and it hurt to see players like Tendulkar, Dravid and Ganguly being so defensive.Kenny said:And that was unusual given the way the summer has gone for India - only Laxman (despite being sconed on the helmet - again) showed any authority really......