When they know its not out or out, I dont think they need to call in for the 3rd umpire just for the sake of it. Obviously if there is even 1% doubt, they should go fo the 3rd umpire. But if the umpire is in a good position and can make the correct call confidently as Taufle did, there isnt any requirement to go for the 3rd umpire.Mr Mxyzptlk said:In which case they should call for the 3rd umpire everytime so that they don't get it wrong.
Badani is trying to get himself to play in the finals instead of Gavaksar?Jono said:Gavaskar run out by Badani. What in the blue hell is going on?
Haha. Only logical reason I can think of :PPratyush said:Badani is trying to get himself to play in the finals instead of Gavaksar?
EDIT: If Blignaut can avoid bowling down the legside. :rolleyes:PY said:This could get interesting now.
Why? Laxman, Dravid are much better than Gavaskar higher up the order. You want the best players to play the most overs..FRAZ said:I think they are wasting Gawaskar by sending him so late at 7th position . He must be up there at 4 I guess .
I really doubt that - Ponting would average more than 23!orangepitch said:Ganguly has done better against aussie bowlers in his career than ponting could
Well they were good enough to draw a test series against West Indies(the best side in the world) in 1981.......marc71178 said:A period when Australia were nowhere near the best side in the World - great.
Ofcourse it had no bearing with the recent MCG test. I was taking issue with the connotation in Marc's post, that Kapil's effort was not against one of the best sides of the time.Neil Pickup said:Marc wasn't belittling it - just pointing out that it had little to no relevance to India winning the Test concerned (Melbourne 2003).