*Official* Under-19 World Cup 2009/10

[Howsie]

Probably would've been Marcus North if Hughes had've scored runs. They brought in Watson to strengthen the bowling.

So then the reason Hughes was dropped was because he wasn't perfrorming and Australia needed to strengthen the team, so they got rid of the weak link.

Thankyou.

 

[wfdu_ben91]

So then the reason Hughes was dropped was because he wasn't perfrorming and Australia needed to strengthen the team, so they got rid of the weak link.

Thankyou.

No, the weak link was Mitchell Johnson, who's poor bowling performance on the first day was the difference between Australia and England in the 2nd Test.

 

[Xuhaib]

Wasn’t very impressed with Babar Azam. Only saw him twice albeit in Pak’s two biggest games and he looked pretty limited when up against good pace bowling which the Windies had in Holder and the Indians have with the likes of Sharma.

Ahmed Shehzad has to be the biggest failure this tournament. Has international pedigree, hyped as Pak's answer to Tendulkar yet has done **** all to date.

belioeve me Shezad looks completley different even to how he looked in the last u-19 wc.Babar is still just 15 looked neat in the final I think he could have a future.

 

[Son Of Coco]

Henriques? pffffffft Marsh is twice the batsmen before he gets out of bed.

So you're saying he's particularly strong when punching through the covers?