182 was a random number, but I'd guess it's a massively larger number than anyone else who's ever used the forum. He talks more about ignore-lists than he talks sensibly about cricket.Haha, 182 members? In that case I am pleased to mention that he is the only one on mine.
Liam, this one was here first - Bennett just made the least original copycat movement ever...Potentially less dire.
I'm terribly sorry about that - but that's the way it goes sometimes.Ridiculous that I started this whole movement and I barely get any billing.
You've clearly missed another 8,312...Hands down, that has to be the most patronising thing you've ever written.
And the English culture - As soon as you win anything you over exaggerate it to te point where it is very annoying labelling your team 100% better than any other util you are brought back ddown to earth. Sorry but I find it offensive to just label Australians and New Zealanders with saying what all of us do and what I wrote probably would do the same to you as what you said to us.Cool, do I have the entire top 10 CW most patronising posts yet?
Look at most of the 'haters' - a huge proportion are from Australia or NZ, it's the new culture from there for the long-term cricket fans to hate Twenty20. It's almost a religion where you reinforce each others irrational opinions by agreeing with each other and then preach about it wherever possible. Hardly any English members here hate Twenty20, they've been able to judge the game without any predisposition because it was new at the time - so there were no other opinions formed about it to bias a judgement.
Don't remember too many Englishmen saying that we were the best cricket team in the world when we won the Ashes.And the English culture - As soon as you win anything you over exaggerate it to te point where it is very annoying labelling your team 100% better than any other util you are brought back ddown to earth. Sorry but I find it offensive to just label Australians and New Zealanders with saying what all of us do and what I wrote probably would do the same to you as what you said to me.
Please shut up.Cool, do I have the entire top 10 CW most patronising posts yet?
Look at most of the 'haters' - a huge proportion are from Australia or NZ, it's the new culture from there for the long-term cricket fans to hate Twenty20. It's almost a religion where you reinforce each others irrational opinions by agreeing with each other and then preach about it wherever possible. Hardly any English members here hate Twenty20, they've been able to judge the game without any predisposition because it was new at the time - so there were no other opinions formed about it to bias a judgement.
Those would be the Twenty20 fans?Perhaps we should cut out 60% of our society's title to appeal to those with shorter concentration spans.
Well said, agree 100%I find it hilarious and quite ironic that the biggest opponents of the Twenty20 game tend to be the ODI fans, considering the same exact criticism that they are shelling out applies also to their own format.
Face it, Twenty20 = ODI without the boredom.
If you want to watch skill, watch Tests. Otherwise, sit back and enjoy the hit contest. The difference between the two hit contests are that one is over faster, has bigger and faster scores, and doesn't have the annoying middle period.
I don't know what you were reading, then, frankly.Don't remember too many Englishmen saying that we were the best cricket team in the world when we won the Ashes.
If you really do think that's "cool", I wonder why you bother to post, tbh.Cool, do I have the entire top 10 CW most patronising posts yet?
First of all, Australians and New Zealanders are probably the largest group of members on CW, so it's hardly surprising if most of the "haters" - as you so poorly put it - are from that part of the world.Look at most of the 'haters' - a huge proportion are from Australia or NZ, it's the new culture from there for the long-term cricket fans to hate Twenty20. It's almost a religion where you reinforce each others irrational opinions by agreeing with each other and then preach about it wherever possible. Hardly any English members here hate Twenty20, they've been able to judge the game without any predisposition because it was new at the time - so there were no other opinions formed about it to bias a judgement.
Fat chance of that!Please shut up.
Some people actually like to appreciate the skills that are utilised in ODIs.I find it hilarious and quite ironic that the biggest opponents of the Twenty20 game tend to be the ODI fans, considering the same exact criticism that they are shelling out applies also to their own format.
Face it, Twenty20 = ODI without the boredom.
If you want to watch skill, watch Tests. Otherwise, sit back and enjoy the hit contest. The difference between the two hit contests are that one is over faster, has bigger and faster scores, and doesn't have the annoying middle period.
I don't see what's hilarious or ironic about it. The difference is, for example, that you find the middle overs in ODIs boring, I don't. All it is, is a difference of opinion.I find it hilarious and quite ironic that the biggest opponents of the Twenty20 game tend to be the ODI fans, considering the same exact criticism that they are shelling out applies also to their own format.
Face it, Twenty20 = ODI without the boredom.
That's where the difference lies for me. ODIs aren't just a "hit contest". I find the endless swinging and big hits of Twenty20 dull. Familiarity breeds contempt, as the saying goes, and big hitting for mine loses it's impact when it's happening three or four times an over for the entire game.Otherwise, sit back and enjoy the hit contest. The difference between the two hit contests are that one is over faster, has bigger and faster scores.
Which skills are utilized in ODI that are not done so in Twenty20?Some people actually like to appreciate the skills that are utilised in ODIs.
And well done to you for noticing it!Hands down, that has to be the most patronising thing you've ever written.