Not really if you pick 5 bowlers - if you have 4 other options then a 5th misfiring cog isn't as important. If you only picked 4 bowlers, however, then he misfired, you are in trouble.facing bats of the quality of hughes, Hussey, Katich et al, just one loose cannon is enough to undo the work of the rerest of the attack.
So who's been the more impressive out of Onions & Harmy?Oz batting on today. Shows they're definitely treating this as a serious match as I thought they'd have wanted to have a bowl first up to give their attack as long game time as they can.
345/8 from 92 overs now; Onions & Harmy unsurprisingly opening the bowling.
Tough one, but I'd say Onions. Harmison's pace has dropped steadily throughout the match and he's starting to look quite lumbering. The bowling was good, and he even got a bit of swing, but there did seem to be some fitness issues. He's an old man now.So who's been the more impressive out of Onions & Harmy?
Doesnt count against Moore's first choice average as umpiring mistakes are not included iircMajor let-off for Moore on a plumb lbw shout. Let it be remembered that Brett Lee should have had a wicket in his first over.
Nah, they are actually.Doesnt count against Moore's first choice average as umpiring mistakes are not included iirc
Shall have to look it up in my book of completely useless information but I thought lbws were excludedNah, they are actually.
Toss up, really. Harmy got more bounce and (more surprisingly) more swing, his outswinger (to the right-handers) was going all innings, but Onions seemed to hurry the batsmen more, despite being marginally slower on average on the gun. Both bowled well, it must be said.So who's been the more impressive out of Onions & Harmy?