dontcloseyoureyes
BARNES OUT
He's been one of NSW best OD bowlers this season. No idea why he's close to the FC side, though.
Casson hasn't really done that well though, and he averages over 40 in domestic cricket. Surely Macgill is the first choice, but Casson isn't doing himself any favours.dontcloseyoureyes said:He's been one of NSW best OD bowlers this season. No idea why he's close to the FC side, though.
Id be extremely surprised if they didnt go after the 2 of them with short balls. I mean theres no way they want any of the England batsmen to spend too much time in the middle and get themselves into form. Flintoff in particular has barely scored a run since return and playing him back into form would be plain stupid. From reports Pietersen nearly got himself out playing the hook shot.Woodster said:Did Pietersen hook compulsively today ? Did they bowl many short balls to him and Flintoff or are they saving it for the Tests ?
Well i think that a spin bowler not bowling his slider or googly is quite different from a fast bowler not bowling a short ball. Variations of length are completely different from variations in bowling because you have to be able to pick a slider and pick a googly from the hand, which is different from getting throat balls. As such everyone including Pietersen and Flintoff know exactly what the Australian plan is so its not like they wont be expecting it. Regardless, most reports claim that Lee and Mcgrath both tried to bounce Pietersen and Flintoff and obviously it didnt work out too successfully.Woodster said:I wasn't suggesting the Aussies want to play them 2 into form, obviously. Bowling short is not the only way of removing them. Its like when Warne bowls against England players before a series, he won't show them the full repertoire of his armoury to get them used to and practice playing against him.
I appreciate they want our 2 key players going into the 1st Test low on confidence, but there's more than one way to skin a cat!!
Disappointing. Still, we'll see if the zero-tolerance policy actually amounts to very much.UncleTheOne said:
It's a lot of talk, just to look good. Sure, if it's really obvious, they'll apprehend someone, but in most cases, it'd be pretty tough to identify who it is doing all the abusing.wpdavid said:Disappointing. Still, we'll see if the zero-tolerance policy actually amounts to very much.
My money is on Collingwood as 12th (which is fair enough as he is probably the next in line to play anyway)Burgey said:Bet they don't use Monty.
I don't think they're competing to be honest - Cook at 3 was inked in IMO.Laurrz said:Englands day i think because 4 of their batsmen struck form and luckily for them they will prolly play Cook instead of Bell
Cook is an obvious choice and Collingwood should be ahead of Bell, they've similar records when you remove the Bangladesh freebies but Bell was completely useless against Australia because of his mental issues which don't seem to have been resolved and Collingwood is a better fielder.albo97056 said:For me the last batting spot is between collingwood and cook, no way bell can be dropped after he practically carried the odi side since the summer and had an amazing summer and previous winter in the tests, he must have the best average in the last calender year than anyone in the side
No cook, has a better record for 2006 than Bell . hes also scored just as many hundreds, and hes been successful in all 3 of the series hes played. Cook isnt going to be dropped, its never been an issue really. For mine its 2 spots between Trescothick v Bell v Collingwood and all 3 of them will probably only get one more outing to push for their place.albo97056 said:For me the last batting spot is between collingwood and cook, no way bell can be dropped after he practically carried the odi side since the summer and had an amazing summer and previous winter in the tests, he must have the best average in the last calender year than anyone in the side