*Official* Third Test at the WACA

[Riggins]

imo if wade had been picked instead of haddin, he would have been reported for pitch tampering 4 times.

there's no evidence to suggest otherwise.

 

[Burgey]

Umpire once again not checking the front foot on the ball before the dismissal

 

[Cabinet96]

Yeah. Desperately needed that. Please be ok with the front line...

 

[Spikey]

that's fine

Look, if Siddle bats ahead of Harris I'm gonna throw toys.

a regular benchmark00 this guy

 

[Riggins]

Jeeez that's a terrible terrible shot.

 

[Cabinet96]

Umpire once again not checking the front foot on the ball before the dismissal

Nah, that one's fair enough.

 

[Burgey]

Reckon that's a no ball tbh but it will be given out

 

[jackbyrne91]

Stokes is pushing that front-line very close.

 

[Bahnz]

England's resident kiwi does the trick.

 

[Son Of Coco]

Ahhh, negative tactics rewarded with a dismissal...

 

[Flem274*]

England with a chance to limit this to under 300. Hope the tail help Smith through to his ton.

 

[Nate]

Congrats to Stokes for a wicket on debut.

 

[Burgey]

What's annoying there is the ball before was a no ball IMO. If the umpire calls it, a Stokes likely adjusts and there's no worry on the dismissal. It's just bizarre the umpires don't even bother calling them or even seemingly looking while they're on the field.

 

[jackbyrne91]

Cook showing why he is captain of the year here. Great fielding positions.

Not.

 

[Son Of Coco]

The amount of time England are taking to do anything is ridiculous. Cook should get an arse-kicking at the end of the day.

 

[Spark]

Jesus they're taking forever and a day to bowl here

 

[Bahnz]

I wonder whether bowlers will start to have shoes developed that have longer heels...

 

[Burgey]

You'll get that back, Bresnan

 

[Cabinet96]

Cook showing why he is captain of the year here. Great fielding positions.

Not.

Well, he got Haddin to find the one man up on the leg side pretty well...

 

[Bahnz]

What's annoying there is the ball before was a no ball IMO. If the umpire calls it, a Stokes likely adjusts and there's no worry on the dismissal. It's just bizarre the umpires don't even bother calling them or even seemingly looking while they're on the field.

By the laws of the game that wasn't a no ball.