I was talking to TumTum.Why the ? Averages significantly less in FC cricket.
Contributes neither as far as I can tellAt the end of the day, runs >>>>>>>>> looks. Else how would Hughes get a run in the team?
Great minds etcA **** **** who flatters to deceive.
Not doing either well atm.At the end of the day, runs >>>>>>>>> looks. Else how would Hughes get a run in the team?
Haha true, but I was more referring to his first run rather than this current one.Not doing either well atm.
When Peter Siddle says you shouldn't bowl short to someone (Peter Siddle ffs!), I think it may be a bad idea."I think it depends on the players you bowl to, because it's definitely a wicket when you pitch the ball up you get your success," said Siddle. "Mike Hussey's not a player you want to bowl short to..."
True. At a young age looks are just as important as runs though in predicting the future of the player.At the end of the day, runs >>>>>>>>> looks. Else how would Hughes get a run in the team?
What's wrong with Ferguson?
Ferguson for smith? No thanks... Ferguson for hughes khawaja to open maybe... Still not keen on another 2 batting changes with whatever bowling changes there might be...I would have them both in the team.
The same can be said of Johnson, under your reasoning,one poor game and all that.tell him im also not impressed by the pile of rubbish he bowled today (and in brisbane)
matchwinner after that ****?HAAAAHAHAHAHAH
was tongue in cheek.The same can be said of Johnson, under your reasoning,one poor game and all that.
Hughes fan vs Smith fan, we must agree to disagree thenFerguson for smith? No thanks... Ferguson for hughes khawaja to open maybe...
no need to bicker, pretty soon ponting n katich will retire and clarke will be banished, and all of them can playHughes fan vs Smith fan, we must agree to disagree then
Looks terrible IMO.no need to bicker, pretty soon ponting n katich will retire and clarke will be banished, and all of them can play
hughes
watson
khawaja
ferguson
hussey
smith
like the look of that lineup
what else would you propose for the future?Looks terrible IMO.
if clarke keeps failing, why should he be in the team?Yeah I agree. Ferguson in for Clarke, with Smith at 6 is possibly the most terrible thing you could think of.
Lol nah im actually a massive hughes fan but he has been really struggling jately and at least smith brings good hands in the field and the small possibility for a wicket... As i said id prefer just the one change if necessary khawaja for ponting.Hughes fan vs Smith fan, we must agree to disagree then
Have you been watching Australian cricket for more than a few months?if clarke keeps failing, why should he be in the team?
It's fashionable to blame Clarke. Pretty much the litmus Test of knowing what you're talking about when it comes to Australian cricket - if you think Clarke should be dropped you're a numpty.Have you been watching Australian cricket for more than a few months?