Don't remember saying that, must have been someone else.Weren't you saying 2 tests ago that Hilfenhaus struggles because the other bowlers weren't bowling well enough, and that if they bowled better, he'd take more wickets?
Why am I imagining this tactic to involve smoke bombs disguised as cricket balls and/or ice cream bombe?Have to give credit to Ponting, I suppose. To a man the Sky comms were saying it was a poo tactic, but the ptoof of the pudding...
You can't be hiding your #5 for your #6, surely?Should have sent Bell in to face MJ rather than Colly. I love Colly, he's great on slow low wickets, but he was never going to survive. He goes so deep in his crease and was a sitting duck to that late swing.
yeah you're right. Can't tell Colly his technique isn't good enoughYou can't be hiding your #5 for your #6, surely?
50 for Ding Dong anyway, looks in good touch so will doubtless piss it away soon.
You students and your drugs...Why am I imagining this tactic to involve smoke bombs disguised as cricket balls and/or ice cream bombe?
Thank you.Have the common decency to edge one and get out, Swann.
****ing uncanny.Swann is playing poorly, doesn't have to play these shots, just stick around and let Bell do all the work.
Yeah you can't be doing that tbh.You can't be hiding your #5 for your #6, surely?
50 for Ding Dong anyway, looks in good touch so will doubtless piss it away soon.