*Official* Third Test at the WACA

[Jono]

Shut the **** up Ian Healy.

 

[Spark]

I tell you what - don't think this'll be out but I'm amazed this didn't bowl him

 

[Jacknife]

Wow I thought that looked out,not enough of the ball hitting.

 

[Days of Grace]

Shut the **** up Ian Healy.

The man has no shame.

I think the fact that Australia have been sinking for some time means that he's finally coming unhinged for good.

 

[HeathDavisSpeed]

One change to UDRS I'd like to see, is that if you've got a losing appeal that goes down to that orange "Umpires Call", you don't lose your challenge. Clearly, when it's that close to a change in decision, it was worth the question and not a waste of time - therefore, you shouldn't lose a challenge.

 

[HeathDavisSpeed]

Shut the **** up Ian Healy.

Is it me, or does he seem to have been in the commentary box all ****ing day. Echo your sentiments entirely.

 

[Jacknife]

One change to UDRS I'd like to see, is that if you've got a losing appeal that goes down to that orange "Umpires Call", you don't lose your challenge. Clearly, when it's that close to a change in decision, it was worth the question and not a waste of time - therefore, you shouldn't lose a challenge.

Totally agree.

 

[vcs]

Now Siddle just needs to get to 50 to compensate for Watson's previous unsuccessful review...

 

[Burgey]

Not out. reasonable enough I suppose. Ball still moving a bit off the deck too.

In other news, if Phil Hughes is **** as a prospect, Finn is England's equivalent.

 

[Jono]

Is it me, or does he seem to have been in the commentary box all ****ing day. Echo your sentiments entirely.

The most biased hack. Must suck balls for him that Australia are so poo.

 

[Spark]

Gah fail. Picked out the one man within 50 square metres. Ah well, good knock.

 

[Jono]

Lol Mitch, throw it away you ****.

 

[morgieb]

One change to UDRS I'd like to see, is that if you've got a losing appeal that goes down to that orange "Umpires Call", you don't lose your challenge. Clearly, when it's that close to a change in decision, it was worth the question and not a waste of time - therefore, you shouldn't lose a challenge.

Yeah good call.

 

[GIMH]

yeeeeeeeeeeeeessssssss

 

[Jacknife]

Do one you mug Johnson, played well to be fair.

 

[vcs]

I'll give Finn one thing.. he can ****ing well field off his own bowling.

LOL, another cheap wicket in true Finn tradition.

 

[Jono]

Not out. reasonable enough I suppose. Ball still moving a bit off the deck too.

In other news, if Phil Hughes is **** as a prospect, Finn is England's equivalent.

Finn has as many wickets as Hughes has runs tbh.

 

[Spark]

One change to UDRS I'd like to see, is that if you've got a losing appeal that goes down to that orange "Umpires Call", you don't lose your challenge. Clearly, when it's that close to a change in decision, it was worth the question and not a waste of time - therefore, you shouldn't lose a challenge.

Disagree. Umpire's call means it's marginal and not a howler, and we're trying to discourage reviews for those.

 

[King Pietersen]

Finn. What a bowler.

 

[hazsa19]

Finn and Hussey would make a great double act.