nope, coin tosses are 50-50 so there's not much chance of him winning the next one after two wins in a row already.Raining today but hot and dry for the first 2 days of the test. Could be a big toss to win......can Ali Cook win 3 in a row?
LOL.....que the CW nerds to come in and explain the laws of probability to us again.nope, coin tosses are 50-50 so there's not much chance of him winning the next one after two wins in a row already.
Well each toss is independent of the other, so he has just as much chance this one as he has in the other ones, and every one in the future.nope, coin tosses are 50-50 so there's not much chance of him winning the next one after two wins in a row already.
Que?LOL.....que the CW nerds to come in and explain the laws of probability to us again.
I was waiting for the maths nerds to arrive not the spelling police!!Que?
Is that your excuse for the last 6 months?I was waiting for the maths nerds to arrive not the spelling police!!
Posting in my ****ty IPad.......it seems to makeup it's own mind what I'm trying to say.
Watson may actually be better at 6 for all you know.Philhughesisbes said:1.Warner
2.Rogers
3.Khawaja
4.Hughes
5.Clarke
6.Smith(if not fit then Watto).
7.Haddin
8.Siddle
9.Harris
10.Bird
11.Lyon
Surely they shouldn"t pick Starc ahead of Bird ( but its pretty much confirm Starc is playing tomorrow).Even worse how could they contemplate batting Warner anywhere but opening is beyond me.The rationale is that Warner might not be technically equipt to deal with Anderson( yea right and Watson is).Can"t remember predicting an Aussie 11 and getting it right in the last 3 years, which might say a lot about my selecting ability or the fact that our selectors don"t have a clue.Surley they will not play Smith at 4?
Cue idiots still getting it wrong.LOL.....que the CW nerds to come in and explain the laws of probability to us again.
I actually think Warner's the best person to put up against Anderson because Jimmeh doesn't react well to being smashed.Surely they shouldn"t pick Starc ahead of Bird ( but its pretty much confirm Starc is playing tomorrow).Even worse how could they contemplate batting Warner anywhere but opening is beyond me.The rationale is that Warner might not be technically equipt to deal with Anderson( yea right and Watson is).Can"t remember predicting an Aussie 11 and getting it right in the last 3 years, which might say a lot about my selecting ability or the fact that our selectors don"t have a clue.
Tbf Twatto often whacks him for a few fours in the opening overs and it doesn't bother him but I suppose he knows it's only a matter of time before that massive pad presents itself for an LBW shout.I actually think Warner's the best person to put up against Anderson because Jimmeh doesn't react well to being smashed.
The myth that Warner doesn"t have a good technique has all originated as a result of his 20 20 exploits.Warner"s technique is better than most give him credit for. He has proven himself up the order an now they"re playing him at 6.Selectors my moving batsmen all over the order are destroying careers.We need stability in the order.The constant changing and shifting isn"t helping the team.Had those selectors been thinking straight Warner would be the first opener picked.Warner is a much much better batsman than Watson and the only reason Watson should be in the team and batting to higher than 6 is because of his all round ability.Watson won"t score big hundreds consistently.He doesn't have the concentration to score big, why is he opening?I actually think Warner's the best person to put up against Anderson because Jimmeh doesn't react well to being smashed.