dontcloseyoureyes
BARNES OUT
You get in here too. More love to go round.LongHopCassidy said:Family forum..............
You get in here too. More love to go round.LongHopCassidy said:Family forum..............
I have no idea what you're trying to say. I have never said Nadal was a bad player, chump. What I did do, however, is retort your 'experience' argument.Sanz said:So why did Agassi lose to Rafael in straight set then ? I am sure he didn't have any big match experience either.
Talk about shifting Goalposts, well you still missed the goal, proves that monkeys cant play football.
Grow up.Scaly piscine said:Regardless the fact remains Nadal is a poser.
But in the earlier rounds he could have purely used his skill to beat the lesser opponents. Against Federer on grass in the Wimbledon final, it's gonna take a bit more.benchmark00 said:Nadal - could've gone out first round if his opponent had some more experience.
Well done buddhy, you've just made the most irrelevant post of the thread.Buddhmaster said:But in the earlier rounds he could have purely used his skill to beat the lesser opponents. Against Federer on grass in the Wimbledon final, it's gonna take a bit more.
Maybe you should sit the next couple of plays out.Buddhmaster said:Murphy's too cool to tell me how what I said is irrelevant, so can someone else?
We discussed you talking, remember?Buddhmaster said:Yay I won
did you watch the final at all? i think he came to the net even more than federer(or at least as much) and was fairly successful at net as well....Sir Redman said:Chuffed that Federer won. I'm not a fan of Nadal at all: I hate his stupid 3/4 shorts, his singlet, his hairstyle and most of all I hate his stand-3-metres-behind-the-baseline-and-play-horrible-topspin-loopies-all-game style. That type of play annoyed the hell out of me when I was a tennis player and it bores me to tears watching it now.
Ikebenchmark00 said:We discussed you talking, remember?
No, because I was on holiday and didn't stay at any places with Sky tv. I'm just generalising based on what I've seen from him on clay and hard courts.Anil said:did you watch the final at all? i think he came to the net even more than federer(or at least as much) and was fairly successful at net as well....
well, give the guy some credit for getting over some steep learning curves really quickly....he didn't look too shabby at the net when he did choose to come in....his general quickness around the court aided him there as well...he was very nervous at the beginning of the match and federer really took advantage and grabbed the first set before nadal knew what hit him...then his natural competitiveness came to the fore and he really took the fight to federer and there was a perceptible drop in federer's quality of play.....the 2nd and 3rd sets were extremely close and one loose game in the fourth set threw away the match for nadal....federer himself acknowledged at the end that the nervous giveaway at the beginning by nadal was what helped him win what ultimately was a very close match....federer was clearly the better player on the day but i'm pretty sure this guy would've won against most other people...and quite likely would win the whole thing one of these days.....Sir Redman said:No, because I was on holiday and didn't stay at any places with Sky tv. I'm just generalising based on what I've seen from him on clay and hard courts.